Two Bay “Orange Hoodie” Awarded 1883-CC Morgan $’s in bad Slabs

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, Jul 2, 2023.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    More from the Chinese bad seller of counterfeit “coins” in fake “PCGS” slabs, these are just two of the recent ones listed to be sold…

    The first example has some of the best seller images I have seen for these, but things go sideways pretty quickly on further review!

    1st CT combo.jpg
    Those familiar with genuine PCGS slabs will notice at least one thing missing; and then there is the barcode:

    bc no.jpg
    But most importantly, there is the “coin”!

    Attributing it (ALWAYS MY 1ST STEP!) to known genuine examples “VAMS” shows a unique for this date/ example mint mark location/ placement:

    CCs.jpg
    And comparing it to the known common reverse used for all years of these counterfeits (like the 1881-CC) you see common features:

    revs.jpg
    Unfortunately, the on-line cert used for this one is no help, as there are no images of the genuine example:

    cert.jpg
    Full disclosure- I have a grading discussion going on this one on Coin Chat at: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/thoughts-on-the-grade-of-this-1883-cc-morgan.406321/#post-24634956 :D...

    But, looking through the PCGS auction archive turns up another example!

    Auction.jpg

    Clicking “original lot” shows this example:

    June slab combo.jpg
    And this one DOES have an on-line cert image:

    June cert.jpg
    Comparing this bad example to the genuine one (on the right) yields these images:

    CT common.jpg

    Swing and another miss!

    And then comparing both bad reverses we see the same bad mintmark location and major flaw:

    2-bad revs.jpg
    And the “punch line”…
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    double hoodie.jpg
    Best, Jack.
     
    Mr.Q and -jeffB like this.
  4. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Another flaw that I noticed is the raised line between the tip of the left (facing) olive branch to the eagles wing. Unless that is a VAM, I've never seen that on a Morgan before.
     
    Cheech9712 and Jack D. Young like this.
  5. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    As always Jack, thank you for rooting out these fakes. You're vigilance is a service to all collectors.
     
  6. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Good eyes also
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  7. HAB Peace 28 2.0

    HAB Peace 28 2.0 The spiders are as big as the door

    So they’re faking stuff like 1883 CC Morgan’s on eBay now? That’s really nice to know. A nice confidence booster, for those who buy/sale on eBay regularly too. Good eye, and thanks for looking out too btw.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  8. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the post.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  9. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

  10. Mark68

    Mark68 Well-Known Member

    Lable lettering spacing is a giveaway.
     
  11. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Thank you!
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  12. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Even large Bay sellers are falling for these...

    listing.jpg
    desc.jpg desc2.jpg

    slab combo.jpg
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  13. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Ouch. And with one of the most impossible-to-miss tells right (not) there in the corner.
     
  14. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    Is the counterfeit reverse die developing a die crack extending from the rim running through the "T" to the "A" in "STATES"? If so - certainly will help in identifying future counterfeits struck using this die.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page