I just found out my CAC results. I sent 3 of these Flying Eagle Cents to CAC. Two of them CAC'd with a green sticker. These were covered in green PVC gunk. I used an 18 hour acetone soak and gently used a q-tip to remove the green that wanted to hang on. Here are the before and after conservation photos: These are the 2 that CAC'd. The one that didn't was one that I thought would gold CAC, ironically. BEFORE: AFTER: BEFORE: AFTER:
Here's the one that didn't CAC. BEFORE: AFTER: (Sorry the pics cut off a bit. Edited this on my phone, so I messed it up).
Yeah I couldn't recall the exact amount but I knew they were cheap for the finial results . Good eye and great run of luck.
Not that I take any merit in CAC or even own a coin that has been sticker between the 2 Au 55 the second is no where near as nice as the first posted. What do I know only been collecting for 55 years your 3rd posted coin looks to be an xf in my eyes.
Shows what I know. I thought the 1857 that failed to pass was an AU58. It has a lot more flash than the 1858 AU55. But the 1858 AU55 is a high leaves reverse FS-1901, which can bring a nice premium if I find the right buyer for it.
The auction houses would put representatives into Thunderdome to get Paddy's coin into their catalogs. 'Tis a fat steak held above slavering dogs. PVC intervention, done right and successfully, should not be a factor in surface originality or grade. To my mind, you may have gotten just_a_bit lucky here, especially with the MS62. I see what sure looks like permanent damage - which ought to have been caught - in at least the stamens(?) atop the wreath above the N in ONE, and possibly also next to the second A in AMERICA. Not to take away the quality of what may be the most stupendous PVC plasticizer intervention on a single coin I've ever seen. That coin should have been trashed, and it wasn't.
There were 9 of them, actually. https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ho...these-flying-eagle-cents-sellers-pics.278838/