Split planchet or cut marks?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Dougmeister, Jun 29, 2016.

?

Which is it?

  1. Split planchet

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  2. Cut marks

    14 vote(s)
    82.4%
  3. Other / Don't know

    2 vote(s)
    11.8%
  1. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    What do you all think?

    s-l1600.jpg s-l1600 (1).jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. beef1020

    beef1020 Junior Member

    cut mark. Nice fugio!
     
    Cascade likes this.
  4. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

    Its amazing to think, how that coin could have affected the people that handled it, mabye some of the signers of the declaration had it at one point in time or another!
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  5. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    I'm thinking cut mark, but that's really cool!!!
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    yes, cut mark
     
  7. jester3681

    jester3681 Exonumia Enthusiast

    I'm curious to see what you think when you get the coin in hand, Doug. The obverse appears to be a split to me. The reverse is questionable, but it almost looks like discoloration - where the line passes the outer rings, it looks like the copper is solid.
     
  8. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Well, I received the coin on Saturday. Here are some close-ups. Do they change anyones opinion or just backup the existing opinions?
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Cut from a sharp knife. Possibly someone of the period was going to make a half cent for change. They did that especially with Spanish 8 reales too bad as it has exceptionally nice surfaces for one
     
    TypeCoin971793 and Tim Lackie Jr like this.
  10. David Setree Rare Coins

    David Setree Rare Coins Well-Known Member

    The close ups really helped. A cutting tool has a beveled edge and the edge view of the coin shows this plainly.
     
  11. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Thanks, everyone. I'm returning the coin to the eBay seller.

    Do you all think it is reasonable to ask him to cover the return shipping since it was not as described?
     
    Tim Lackie Jr likes this.
  12. Pap4tinker

    Pap4tinker Active Member

    If you do not ask, you will not receive. Because of the edge not split through and the bevels of the split, i totally agree that they are cut marks.
     
  13. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    That depends on how it was described. Any photo is also part of the description, too, since you posted the seller's photo in order to get our opinions without seeing the coin in hand, and expected us to be able to come to a buy/no buy decision based on them, then you really have no grounds for sticking the seller with return shipping. Doing so will probably also get you blocked. Pay the return shipping, do an amicable return, and move on.

    I don't know my Fugio die varieties, so if you happened to get a particularly rare one, the cut may not matter. Since @jester3681 probably would have mentioned it, however, I assume that this is not the case.
     
  14. jester3681

    jester3681 Exonumia Enthusiast

    The Fugio is a late state 8-X, fairly common. A Bank of New York coin. Examples are plentiful - I was actually looking at this item when Doug reached out to me. I was seriously considering buying - the seller describes it as a split plantchet and his pictures are misleading. Not saying this is intentional or dishonest. I have a bad habit of doing most of my shopping and Cointalking on my phone, so images are small and difficult to enlarge for better viewing.

    Just as a learning experience for anyone interested in Fugios, the 8-X in its last two die states can *easily* be identified by the halfmoon die crack across the better part of the lower obverse. This was the terminal die state for obverse die #8. One of those identifiers that you can use, even in well worn examples.

    My 8-X is significantly double struck, but this identifier allows concrete identification, even though part of the second strike and poor planchet quality mask much of the lower obverse:
    28748127_800x600.jpg
     
  15. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    I returned it back in July.

    Then just now, I saw it listed by another seller on eBay:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/282291625505

    First time I've experience seeing a coin that I returned put up for sale by someone other than the original seller.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2016
  16. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    That seller calls it a die break. :vomit:
     
  17. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Turns out it's a CT member; you'll find this auction linked in our For Sale section.
     
  18. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I saw that. Wasn't going to point it out.

    Thanks for the heads-up, though.

    Edit: I pointed him to this thread. I suggested he return it if he still can. I even offered to buy the coin, but at a problem-coin price.
     
  19. kolhoznik

    kolhoznik Member

    Yes it is amazing how things travel around. I bought it over the counter at a coin shop near Chattanooga, TN.
     
  20. DysfunctionalVeteran

    DysfunctionalVeteran Oddly enough

    A cut is a split of sorts based on perception.



    Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page