$2 note circus

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by longnine009, May 5, 2016.

  1. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. gxseries

    gxseries Coin Collector

    The irony is that the money is spent in a school where you are supposed to go for education. You would think adults would be a bit more educated about currencies. Sure, there might be some high quality counterfeits which may be challenging to identify. But wait, for the sake over 2 dollars AND to get the authorties involved
     
  4. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    Don't officials know: "google is your friend" ? :p
     
    Garlicus and Jwt708 like this.
  5. Dean 295

    Dean 295 D.O.M.

    Law suit, could be.
     
  6. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

  7. Nycmacman

    Nycmacman Active Member

    Not saying she should, but if she plays this correctly she could possibly have a serious lawsuit.
     
  8. Jwt708

    Jwt708 Well-Known Member

    Little extreme. The article mentioned
    I work in/for? the government and I use it all the time...;):D
     
    longnine009 likes this.
  9. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I could see why they would question the note.

    1. They rarely if ever see a $2 so they might not know about $2 notes.
    2. It has a red seal not a green one.
    3. If they are familiar with twos, the ones they have seen probably all had the signing of the Declaration of Independence on them, this one has Monticello on it.
    4. It doesn't have In God We Trust printed on it. (It is amazing how often I have heard that as being the reason an old note is considered to be a fake.)

    I'm surprised the detector pen didn't work on the note. They tend to use iodine to react with the starch in the sizing in wood pulp papers turning dark. The cotton/linen paper of US currency doesn't have that sizing. On the other hand the paper may have been treated differently 60 years ago. They did use a different wet printing process back then.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page