Early Lincolns vs Modern Lincolns

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Omegaraptor, Apr 4, 2016.

?

Which one do you prefer?

  1. Classic Lincolns

    38 vote(s)
    92.7%
  2. Modern Lincolns

    3 vote(s)
    7.3%
  1. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    And:
    upload_2016-4-5_10-52-50.jpeg

    upload_2016-4-5_10-53-9.jpeg
     
    JPeace$, Paul M., Evan8 and 1 other person like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    All toners, all the time. All of these are PCGS graded. And all are Proofs.

    Top Row (L to R): 1915, 1941, 1950, 1955, 1961
    Bottom Row (L to R): 1966, 1972, 1989, 2004, 2011

    Sharpest strike definitely in the 1915-1917 era.
    Strike/dies got really worn and soft in the mid to late 1950s.
    The Redesign starting in 1969 got much more "cartoony".
    The later Shield design post 2010 has almost a snakeskin look to it (not a fan).

    [​IMG]
     
  4. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    Hard to beat the early Lincolns for look and sharpness. Def peaked out around 1915-1916.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2016
  5. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    The 15 is raw and the 16 is MS-64 BN. Both are amazing in hand.
     
  6. carboni7e

    carboni7e aka MonsterCoinz

    Love that 1915!
     
  7. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    I bought it on ebay. I thought i was cherrypicking a matte proof until i got it in hand. Still one of my favorites regardless.
     
  8. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    That is a gorgeous set. Just need a matte VDB
     
  9. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Memorials can be beautiful too: 1987rainbow.jpg 1987rainbow2.jpg 1987rainbow3.jpg 1987rainbowREV.jpg
     
  10. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I like the 1947 Lincoln s-l140(19).jpg
    But I like the 1957 Better[​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  11. cladking

    cladking Coin Collector

    I suppose a lot of the reason I've grown to prefer the memorials in the last 20 years is just that they aren't appreciated by very many. As the years have gone by I've even come to prefer the memorial though in 1959 I thought it was ugly, too big, and cumbersome. It's really pretty good art for the time period it was done. The lack of competitions allows me first crack at coins I couldn't even afford otherwise.

    The attrition on these coins is remarkably high.

    The poll is flawed. I don't much care for the shield cents (yet) either. I voted for "moderns" but meant "memorials".
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  12. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Moderns here! I have a few nice wheats, but I'm not one to collect the same thing over & over, like a whole series. I prefer type collections, lots of different coins, which is probably why I'm drawn to commemoratives and State & Parks Quarters, especially the Pucks.

    As for modern Lincolns, I like the Satins from the 2005 to 2010 mint sets, a distinct variety with a satin finish and sharp strike, similar to early matte proofs, and super low absolute mintages.
     
  13. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Not as bad as the "spaghetti hair" coins.

    Agree, man, agree! A 1915 mint set might be a nice project. I don't think there are any real rarities that year, are there?

    It's hard to find nice memorial toners though. You have to really hunt.

    Great coins! I've kind of been looking for one of those all silver toned Lincolns. I've seen them on 60s era proofs, but nowhere else really.
     
  14. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Well, not Memorials, but have you noticed how the 2009 Satins tone? The mint delayed delivery on these sets, as they had a "problem" with toning. The ones I've put in albums develop a beautiful rainbow target toning within months.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  15. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Spaghetti George is pretty bad, I agree, but have you ever taken an early cent and set it side by side to compare with a later pre-shield cent? Say an 1909 and 2009 obverses.... if not, give it a shot. ;)
     
  16. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    I have not. I've only seen mint red on these. Also, I pretty much ignore 99% of coins dated after 1999.
     
  17. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    I am not sure just what conditions you are talking about, but 1915-S coins tend to be a bit unusual. For instance, there are only 98 red PCGS Lincolns in any condition. And there is a 1915- half.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  18. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    Silver toned wheats IFC are hard to find, but they are out there. 1909vdbfeb2012.jpg 1909vdbfeb2012b.jpg 1909vdbfeb2012rev.jpg 1909vdbfeb2012revb.jpg 1909vdbfeb2012compare.jpg
     
    Evan8, JPeace$, dwhiz and 1 other person like this.
  19. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  20. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    I don't collect Lincoln's, but I prefer the Wheat's. Even as a kid, when I found one in loose change, I kept them.
     
  21. carboni7e

    carboni7e aka MonsterCoinz

    I'm hoping this one grades this time around.

    [​IMG]
     
    Paul M., Evan8, robec and 1 other person like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page