65' Washington

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Pickin and Grinin, Feb 22, 2016.

  1. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Is there anything that stands out about this coin? 65 washie obv #2.jpg 65 washie rev#1.jpg This is pocket change.
    I am trying to find out from the Numismatist here, if there is any visual thaws?
    I have found something wrong but you cant tell it from a pic.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    What is "visual thaws"?

    Chris
     
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    In hand it is an awesome looking coin.
    Even with the blow to the ear and cheek.
     
    dchjr likes this.
  6. jwitten

    jwitten Well-Known Member

    Why would someone fake a 1965 quarter?
     
  7. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am not sure?
    I am looking for help, to identify the coin.
    Sms, a Philly.
    Does it look right?
     
  8. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Maybe someone would make the edges all white so someone would find it and say "ermahgerd it's a 1965 transitional silver quarter I have to take this to PCGS now".

    Don't do this, it's illegal.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  9. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Not a washington guy, but it appears to be a dynamite strike. Almost too much so.
     
  10. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Just a wild guess: silver planchet?
     
  11. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    No even though it has that appearance.It weighs between 5.6 and 5.7. Holds at seven
     
  12. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    The rim clearly shows the clad.
     
  13. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am not a Washington guy either.
     
  14. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I find a lot of new collectors, when seeing 1960's coins, believe the coin is unusual. In the 1960's the mint actually struck coins with relief, not the comic book low relief they use today. Therefor, 1960's coins simply look a lot better. A Washington quarter, when struck in higher relief, is not a bad looking coin. Most quarters in your pocket, though, look like cheap game board pieces.
     
  15. 19Lyds

    19Lyds Member of the United States of Confusion

    I'm not seeing anything that I would not expect to see.
     
  16. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I tried putting the quarter in a air-tight plastic holder. It wouldnt fit it was too big in diameter.i hsvnt been able to find my mm gauge. I am off to the hardware store tomorrow to pick one up I will let you know what the measurement is.
     
  17. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Just sandwich it with another quarter and see if one is slightly larger :)
     
  18. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I just measured it. it comes out to 31/32 which is 24.6063 mm.
     
  19. PennyGuy

    PennyGuy US and CDN Copper

    I looked to see a 65 foot Washington. Just looks to be a circulated quarter to me. 1965 quarter production was huge at 1,819,717,540. The single largest year of production according to my Red Book.
     
  20. coloradobryan

    coloradobryan Well-Known Member

    65 quarters may have the highest mintage of the era, but finding a nice early die state ms-65 or higher coin is pretty hard to do. Since there were no mint sets issued that year, and the SMS coins don't count as mint state regular issue business strikes, and the coins were largely overlooked at the time, there really are not that many gem specimens to be had. In circulation, they are still very common, but nearly all are low grade or culls. Finding one xf or above is a real treat.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page