Characteristics of cleaned coins

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by oldwormwood, Nov 22, 2015.

  1. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    We can only hope that's the prevailing attitude then.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TubeRider

    TubeRider Active Member

    You guys are great!
     
  4. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    Late to the party as usual, but I submit that based on the photos in the o.p. you can't say whether either coin has been cleaned or not. Photos of toned coins don't show all kinds of things... especially luster and fine hairlines. They are simply representations of real things. You have to see them in hand to know for sure.
    Or you can simply trust in the TPG or sticker company, and bid freely.
     
  5. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    Most of my coins got a lot of action back in the day (i.e.- they are really well circulated) so they'd look really wacky if they got dipped. That said, for uncirculated coins I'd be hesitant to dip because (1) I'd hate to disturb a naturally occurring process that's been cooking along since before I existed (unless it was actively destroying the coin) and (2) the chances of me messing up are high, because that's how my luck works. The latter would be my driving motive to not dip a coin.
     
  6. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    One excellent thread!
     
    TubeRider likes this.
  7. TubeRider

    TubeRider Active Member

    I'll Second That!!
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Dipping coins is nothing new, it has been with us for well over a century. It was acceptable then and it is acceptable now, and there is a very good reason for that. You see, dipping coins has allowed us all to have the coins we have today, in the condition they are in today. That is because dipping has protected those coins from certain destruction.

    Think of all the millions of older coins, beautiful older coins ! Hardly any at all of them would exist today in that condition had it not been for dipping. That is because toning, if left unchecked, will destroy coins with a certainty. And prior to recent years none of the storage methods that we use today to greatly slow down the effects of toning even existed.

    And that is why the harsh cleaning of coins, as well as the dipping of coins, even came to be. Hundreds of years ago coin collectors realized what the ravages of toning was doing to their coins. So every so often they would pick up each of the coins in their collections and wipe them down with cloths and rags in an effort to wipe away the toning, as well as the dirt and grime that accumulated on the coins over time.

    Eventually somebody discovered an easier way, and a way that did not result in their coins looking polished and covered with fine scratches and hairlines - dipping. They discovered that an easily obtainable chemical would remove the effects of toning and prevent their coins from turning an ugly dark brown, an even gunmetal grey, or even black. What's more they discovered that sometimes even those ugly black coins could be returned to their original beauty, assuming the coins were dipped correctly.

    This is how and why dipping coins came to be acceptable, and why it will probably always be with us. At least until somebody can manage to come up with a storage method that will actually prevent the ravages of toning and preserve a coin in its present state.

    Now today, yes some frown on the practice of dipping coins. But that is because they have never experienced what toning, if left unchecked, can and inevitably will do to coins. This is a certainty, it is not a question of if it will happen, only when. And they have forgotten the lessons of history, or never even been aware of them in the first place.

    They have also forgotten, or been totally unaware, that those beautiful toned coins in their collections, were almost certainly dipped at some point long before they ever acquired them. And that the beautiful toning they see on them today would not even be there had those coins not been dipped earlier in the life of that coin. If they had not been dipped those beautiful coins would today be ugly and dark chunks of metal that would be shunned by collectors.
     
    micbraun, Kentucky and TubeRider like this.
  9. TubeRider

    TubeRider Active Member

    Very well stated. I have no problem with dipped coins. My point is that I do ponder the future possibility, as knowledge and technology increases, of a far superior method being developed rendering current methods obsolete, instantly detectable and possibly frowned upon.
     
  10. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    I don't know how you guys find the time to post your long informative replies...perhaps I'll have something like this to do when I retire.

    Just a suggestion: I think new members such as myself would be even more well served if the experts would not "dumb-down" their replies with blanket statements that may become confusing such as " dips are acid, remove a coin's surface (which they do change in some way), and damage every single coin." In conventional usage, dips are an acidic solution, remove oxidation, and MAY harm a coin.

    I'm reminded of a numismatist/chemist who insists that toning is oxidation that destroys a coin's original surface. That's a fact; yet I have a good laugh when I see all those beautiful, rainbow, RUINED coins sell for $$$$.

    In the past, I have ruined the eye appeal of a coin or three with a quick dip. Fortunately, with more experience about what the final result will look like - which coins to dip - that is less often the case. See the dealer's post above.
     
    TubeRider likes this.
  11. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank


    he should live so long.

    :)

    Then he will be old and smarter.
     
  12. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Lacquer. Any time you want, acetone makes lacquer disappear without a trace, and it makes a coin impervious to corrosion.

    Part of the problem is, the definition and procedure of dipping is easy to learn, but knowing when to apply the information is very much *not* easy. I lean away from going into detail about dipping procedure in public forum posts because of those who are only passing through, and may just be experiencing numismatics as a passing fad. These folks, lacking our long-term commitment to the hobby and our understanding of ourselves as merely caretakers of history, might then go out and trash a valuable coin permanently. Once overdipped, a coin cannot be saved.

    Honestly, I don't like discussing the subject at all, and wouldn't on my own initiative. I only post about it to avoid the spread of misinformation.

    And frankly, I cannot describe physically removing metal from a coin as anything but "damaging" it.
     
  13. TubeRider

    TubeRider Active Member

    Kind of my thoughts too. With the way technology is progressing; positive ID with Iris Scans at airports from 10 feet away with a moving person, PCGS digitally mapping every coin submitted to detect resubmissions, MRI's, CT scans, even a Coin Sniffer at PCGS! What coin collector down the road wouldn't pay $99.00 for a Phase Plasma Resonance Imaging and Counterfeit Detection Loop that detects everything you could ever want to know about a coin, including chemical enhancement, alloy composition and slabbed counterfeits.
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    And that's kind of the point, right there. What I mean by that is that almost everybody applies different definitions even to common, everyday words. In numismatics, it's far, far worse.

    For you Dave, you see the removing of metal, any metal, as damage. And in a purely technical sense you are absolutely correct. But what about the reality of the situation ?

    You see, in many, many cases a coin has already been damaged, by your definition, by the toning on it. The toning literally consumes the metal, changes its physical state from one substance to an entirely different substance. And it is an undeniable fact that if that toning is left alone, it will continue to damage the coin even more.

    However, if one were to dip that coin, the metal that is removed, isn't even metal anymore, but that different substance that is created by the toning. And the result is that the original underlying metal that has as of yet been unaltered or consumed by the toning is revealed. Thus exposing the coin's original beauty and at the same time eliminating the damaging substance.

    That being the case, how can dipping a coin be thought of as being a bad thing ? And that's what I mean by the reality of the situation.

    Now at the same time I will readily agree that there have been a great many coins dipped, that didn't need to be dipped. The toning on them had not advanced far enough to be harmful in other words. And while toning is inevitable and can never be stopped, with proper storage it can be slowed down to the point that no readily perceivable change will occur in one's lifetime. So if a coin is attractively toned then it best to just leave it alone and store it properly.

    And this is what Dave is talking about when he mentions "knowing when" to dip a coin.

    I also feel it is important make note of the fact that dipping a coin is always a crap shoot. You never, ever, know with any degree of certainty what the outcome will be. You might just as easily end up with a coin that was already ruined before you ever dipped it, the luster could have been totally destroyed by the toning. You might end up with a coin that has an old harsh cleaning revealed that was hiding under that toning. The coin might be covered with hairlines (not from a harsh cleaning, merely from previous rough handling). Or you might get lucky and reveal a gem hiding underneath.

    So while dipping a coin may indeed be quite beneficial, it may also turn out to be a disaster. One would do well to keep that in mind.
     
  15. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It's pretty much like it is with all other things in life, you don't "find the time", you make the time ;)

    I've been doing this, making posts like these, for many years, since long before I was ever forced to retire. And I have always done that because of the importance it carries. For me, we all have a duty to do the important things, to make the time to be able to do them. Just like a lot of the rest of you, I used to work 70-80 hrs a week - every week, for years ! But I would still make the time to do what I do. And I don't do it for me, I've never done it for me. I do it for everybody else because the sharing of knowledge is important. Thus my signature line - which has never changed.

    And please, realize that my signature line, knowledge - share it, is more than anything else a plea, for everybody, to share the knowledge they have ;)
     
    ldhair and TubeRider like this.
  16. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    download.jpg
     
    micbraun likes this.
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Nahhhh, the crowd was much bigger than that :D
     
    Kentucky and micbraun like this.
  18. oldwormwood

    oldwormwood Collector

    Doug,

    Then the surfaces of a TPG slabbed toned coin will still tone (and deteriorate?) over time - all be it more slowly. In that sense, do you think we are we talking about years, decades, or is it dependent more by the initial level of toning?

    It would be interesting to see some "before" and "after" photos of toned coins that were slabbed twenty-five years ago, and measure any changes to the surfaces.

    I like the look of my darker-toned slabbed coins, but now I am beginning to wonder .... :blackeye:
     
  19. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    In the post of mine that you quoted, the key phrase is - That is because toning, if left unchecked, will destroy coins with a certainty.

    And I pretty much already answered your question in post #93 -

    Toning is kind of like a living thing. As long as you feed it, give it what it needs, it will continue to grow. And the more food you give it the faster it grows. The things it primarily needs are air flow and moisture (in the form of humidity). But temperature changes can also accelerate it somewhat. So if you could take these things away, completely, toning would virtually stop.

    But there is no such thing as an airtight coin holder - not one. The plastics they are made of are air permeable, air can pass right through the plastic itself in other words. But at a slow rate. And they are by their nature made of 2 halves, which do not seal completely, not even slabs. Even with the sonic sealing method they use there are still air gaps.

    Air is necessary for toning to occur because without oxygen there can be no oxidation. Air also contains various contaminants, and these contaminants affect toning. Some speed it up, some can cause a given color of toning, others a different color yet. Air also contains humidity, the more humidity the faster the toning.

    This is where proper storage comes in. A hard plastic coin holder is where you start. No they are not airtight, but they do slow down and greatly limit the amount of air that can get to your coins. But by itself that is not enough. So you place your coins in their holders inside another, larger, container and that can also be closed up. This further limits the air flow from getting to your coins. But more importantly it provides you with a contained space so the air inside can be treated if you will by using rechargeable desiccant packs to limit humidity inside that contained space. And you keep this container in an area of your home where it is dark, and the temperature remains fairly constant.

    Do all of these things and toning will be slowed down so much that even over a period of time you will not readily notice any changes. Now above I mentioned your lifetime as a time period. But that is to put things into perspective if you will. Yes toning will occur, even with proper storage, over a long period of time. But it happens slowly, so slowly that if you look at your coins every so often you will not notice any changes. Now if you wait 30 years and don't look at them, and then look at them - yeah you'll probably see a change. But even then it's not going to be terribly drastic.

    And yeah, the initial level of toning that you mentioned is also important. Toning occurs in stages, it is progressive. Rule of thumb, the darker it is the worse it is, and it has a terminal point. Once reached, the damage is already done and cannot be reversed. Typically, terminal toning starts at the outer edges of a coin and works its way inwards, but just like anything there are exceptions.

    So if when you purchase a coin if it has very dark or even black toning around the outer edges then the damage may have already started. And it will continue, even with proper storage, but at a slower rate. And I say may have because sometimes even with black toning, if a coin is dipped and the black toning stripped away, underlying luster may be revealed. Other times the luster is already gone.

    This is why many collectors will not purchase a coin with dark toning - they know what the end result is.

    There is much I could write about this and go on and on, such as toning being dependent upon luster, or the difference in the way a circulated coin tones and the way an MS coin tones. And in other threads I have written about the different things at various times, but to put it all in one place would be a book. But ask a specific question and I'll try and give a specific answer.
     
    Kentucky and TubeRider like this.
  20. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Regarding toning of coins in slabs:

    It is a fact that some coins will tone (when pretty) deteriorate (when ugly) in slabs. Many of you must have seen an old PCI slab with a label reading:100% White. The major grading services are not immune to this either. A while back (1990s) a chemist subjected slabs from several well-known grading services to an atmosphere of sulfur dioxide and all the coins turned. Holders were different then and I am unaware of any new test results. There is another more devious problem. Many coins are dipped and not neutralized properly before submission to a TPGS. When graded they look bright and original but over time (how long?) they can turn.
     
  21. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Doug, I think it is safe to say that when you remove any dark black oxidation from a coin the surface will be etched and no ORIGINAL luster will be present.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page