Seleukid Tet ?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by 7Calbrey, Nov 6, 2015.

  1. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Hi coin-friends. If I'm reading Greek well, the reverse of this silver Tetradrachm indicates it was Seleukid or maybe struck in Sidon. As for the reverse, well all the Macedonians look similar to me. Hope I caught an important coin. It weighs 17.1 g. Thanks for your comments. Seleuk O 001.jpg Seleuk R 001.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    WOW, 7-C, you seem to be hitting on quite a few excellent silver Greek coins---and Tets to top it off ..

    Congrats!!

    But, I'm a bit confused as to how you purchase these types and the seller fails to ID them for you by at least type, mint and ruler ?

    In the months to come, I should be acquiring a few more of these---hopefully, my skill at translating the Greek will improve from what it is at this point.

    Like you, I'd have to go through all the mints to better determine what I actually have.
     
    7Calbrey likes this.
  4. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    Charles, go to Wildwinds -> Greek coins -> use the drop-down menus to access the pages for the Seleukid Kings (Seleukos I, etc). Scroll through the pictures. Look for one with the same control marks on the reverse.
     
    Mikey Zee and Okidoki like this.
  5. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Thank you. I'll be checking on the spot.
     
  6. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    Yes, Seleukos I, Babylon mint. However, I have not seen one with DI below the throne. Nevertheless it appears to be a modern cast replica.
     
    Mikey Zee likes this.
  7. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I think it looks wrong as well, but I'm not that familiar with the Seleukid kings.
     
  8. Ken Dorney

    Ken Dorney Yea, I'm Cool That Way...

    Very flat surfaces, artificial toning (the kind you get from non-silver), overall bad style and visible casting seams.
     
  9. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I see what appears to be a casting seam on the reverse image at 8 o'clock. The obverse image is too blurry to tell much, but the reverse image looks wrong (hard to say why I think that). Perhaps better images will reveal that I'm wrong. I hope so. I just hate the "F" word.
     
    Mikey Zee likes this.
  10. THCoins

    THCoins Well-Known Member

    I have to agree with the probably not genuine verdict. The obverse portrait is difficult to judge because of the scan. On the reverse the style of depiction of Zeus is off and the surfaces look artificial. For comparison, a reverse from Seleukos in the name of Alexander, Babylon Mint, Price 3708:
    RevMedium.jpg
     
    Pishpash, dlhill132, stevex6 and 2 others like this.
  11. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    I'm grateful. I understand that among the 3 Tetradrachms I bought and posted here in the past few days, only one is likely not genuine. I'll go to my dear seller very soon and exchange it for another Tet. Do you agree with me sincere fellows ?
     
  12. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    Probable cast fake ????

    Well, that seems to answer the question why they are not properly Identified....

    And now that casts some doubt on the others---Are they from the same seller???
     
  13. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Yes they are. I kindly appreciate your concern MZ. Please keep up with this matter so that we can come out with the adequate decision in order to choose among exchanging, returning back or purchasing more coins.
     
  14. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Here are scans of the other Tet which figured only in a brief reply. It represents goddess Artemis, daughter of Zeus, and struck in Macedonia. Maced O 001.jpg Maced R 001.jpg Artem 600 O 001.jpg Artem 600 R 001.jpg
     
  15. 4to2centBC

    4to2centBC Well-Known Member

    Interesting. Can we see the edges?

    BTW I do not see casting seams at 8 o'clock. However I am on East Coast time, so maybe we have a time difference :angelic:
     
    Mikey Zee, stevex6, TIF and 1 other person like this.
  16. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    => that mad me laugh out loud (very clever)

    :rolleyes:
     
    chrsmat71 and TIF like this.
  17. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    But you're so easy.....
     
  18. stevex6

    stevex6 Random Mayhem

    Easy is fun ...

    Ummm, don't you remember those days?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Bing likes this.
  19. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    But the arithmetic is wrong!
     
    stevex6 likes this.
  20. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    Hi. Bing and Ken were referring to the first coin of Selukos I and Zeus when talking about the 8 o'clock and the visible casting seams. The matter now concerns the second coin of Artemis which was struck in Macedonia. Please post your opinions and comments, since it would make a big difference to me when exchanging these 2 coins on Monday. I do appreciate your assistance friends.
     
  21. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    It seems I can be fooled far too often (50% of the time?) so my opinion is probably just going to confuse the issue and not clarify anything. I hope it's genuine 7-C
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page