GTG: 1932 Washington Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Morgandude11, Mar 9, 2023.

?

Grade me

  1. AU 58

    2 vote(s)
    8.0%
  2. MS 60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. MS 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. MS 62

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
  5. MS63

    5 vote(s)
    20.0%
  6. MS 64

    9 vote(s)
    36.0%
  7. MS 65

    8 vote(s)
    32.0%
  8. Ms 66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. +

    1 vote(s)
    4.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Okay. I guess I'm the idiot :rolleyes: because I said MS62. So, :facepalm:
     
    WashQuartJesse and masterswimmer like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. WashQuartJesse

    WashQuartJesse Member Supporter

  4. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    64...some chatter in the fields prevents a higher grade in my view
     
  5. numist

    numist Member Supporter

  6. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    Great eye appeal on that beauty. Before looking at the comments or the poll results I gave it an MS-63.

    These early Washington's are notorious for weak strikes. Too much chatter and nicks for me to go higher than the 63 though.
     
  7. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Guessing 63. As others have said, kind of looks like a slider, with some light/moderate contact marks noted. Not saying it isn't nice, but my interpretation of the pics.
     
  8. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am also at 63, A slider with that rub on the cheek.
     
  9. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, the reveal. I think only one person got it. It is an attractive coin, with really nice toning. However, the strike is on the weak side, for sure, which is very typical of early Washington Quarters. What I think some folks are interpreting as rub is just a weak strike. There are a couple of die cracks on the reverse. If I were grading it, I probably would have gone 64, not 62. Oh well, I like it for its eye appeal.

    BF061FCC-CDF7-4F70-B896-0A4BEC60DDEA.jpeg 8253C0B3-DED3-4C02-8E16-8A9B6A16B73A.jpeg
     
  10. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    You shouldn't have second guessed yourself. Nice read on that one.
     
    SensibleSal66 and Morgandude11 like this.
  11. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I dunno about that. I see 62 as a fail for the TPG. In hand, it is at least 1-2 grades under graded.
     
    masterswimmer likes this.
  12. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Wow,this was truly a nuke you probably got a steal price for it also.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  13. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    I agreed with you in my GTG as I said 63. However, I don't have it in hand. So my guess is just that, a guess.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Pictures make it very hard to grade, especially with toned softly struck coins like this one. I think most 1930s Washington Quarters look a lot like this, except for the truly well struck ones. I agree that it definitely should have been graded under gem grade, because of the strike.
     
    masterswimmer likes this.
  15. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    I believe it may have been just a weak strike, as I'm not seeing the typical circulation wear marks, so I'd go with MS65, but then I've never been called an expert on grading anything. LOL

    OKAY, to be fair, I wrote this before I saw the poll numbers or the reveal. Like I said, What do I know?
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  16. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    So a much earlier slider. Nice looking 32
    Morgandude.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page