Questionable Color - any experience resubmitting?

It's just another blip. It's going back again.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I understand the point, but it doesn't apply. I never asked anyone to assess my coin. I just wanted to know some of the member's experiences when trying to resubmit.

I also know that it's common knowledge, I believe I even stated something like that in my previous post.

I'm not trying to be argumentative, so please don't mistake my reply as being upset because I'm not. It's just you're making points to questions that were never asked. I asked specific questions so that I could use the information and make my own conclusion.

Thanks again for the input, it is always appreciated.

 

Got it. Sorry for the confusion.

I simply want to know member's experiences when trying to get a straight grade. Their experience, so it might help me decide if I would like to try it as well.

Thanks @GDJMSP for the question. Hopefully this has helped clarify.

 

For me (and I know I'm usually in the minority), this post muddied the waters even more.

Here's what I understand:

1) You initially started the thread to validate something you already knew -- it's possible to resubmit a QC coin and have it come back without qualifiers.

2) You followed up by asking for advice on how to get the coin to be submitted successfully (assumed to mean getting a non-qualified grade).

It's the second point that I (and apparently others on the board) have a contention with. Without knowing how the coin in question looks, it's impossible to determine whether you should bother to have it resubmitted.

Obviously, if you're just asking the most likely way to get the coin to grade unqualified, the solution is to crack it out and submit it to NGC (assuming it was QCed by PCGS). I would think PCGS has some sort of library of qualified coins it receives, if only for training graders on what to look for. If they see the same coin pop up in their database, they'll likely flag it as QC without really reviewing it.

The reason people are asking to see the coin is simple: You're likely wasting your time resubmitting the coin anyway. At least, if the consensus stands that the color is natural, you'll have a higher probability of attaining a non-QC grade. If the consensus is that the coin is artificially toned, you'll likely get a QC grade again.

Now, all of that said, when you cited the bump in price by losing the QC grade, is the higher price for a vibrantly toned coin in MS63? If the color is irrelevant, why not have the coin dipped or w/e to remove the color outright?

 

I hope this was worth your time. I'm tired of being petty.

 

I had assumed you were sincere in your posts prior to this one, so, at the time I posted it, it was worth my time, yes.

 

I was sincere, but I'm also tired of beating a dead horse. I think this thread has gone a direction that I never intended. With that said, thanks for your input as it is appreciated. I have the information that I was after. Thanks.

 

And just who are you to tell me? Why don't you take the time to do your homework before you make a posting asking for help and we could avoid all this now couldn't we?

I'll give the same speech back to you then. Next time please provide some or at best adequate information/suggestions or just don't reply if your intent is to pick a fight with a member. Thanks.
Pretty big britches for a new member if you ask me, I might add.

 

He joined the same month you did...

 

If you have such a huge profit margin, I would resubmit it until I either agreed it was Q/C, ran out of profit or I received a clear grade.

 

Yes but I don't go around the boards guns a' blazin' either.

 

I'm dumber after reading your post. Thanks for that one

 

I think you're right and it's what I've decided to do. Maybe not until the profit runs completely out, but I'll submit it a few times atleast. Hopefully it comes back clean on the first go around! Thank you for the input and suggestion.

 

Sounds right to me.

If you are tired, then don't be.

NorthKorea was simply being honest, and per my experience, he is pretty accurate.

:deadHorse:

 

Hallo

 

@Treashunt, there really is no need to continue the conversation outside of my original question. This is a waste of your time, my time, and everyone else's time. Have a great rest of your day... I know I will.

 

FYI, he sent me some images of the coin and based on the look of the images, I agree with PCGS on this one. I didn't see a need to resubmit the coin until it browned up a bit. It is a very nice key date in the 64 range with a huge upside if it could get a clean grade. I will respect the wishes of the OP and not divulge the coin any further. In a sence I understand his dilemma here and why he is reluctant to show the coin as strange as it sounds.

 

Apparently you have never been on a forum, the day all responses stay within the parameters of the OP Doug will have a stroke!