NOT IN A BOX. NOT WITH A FOX. NOT IN A HOUSE. NOT WITH A MOUSE. I WOULD NOT EAT THEM HERE OR THERE. I WOULD NOT EAT THEM ANYWHERE.
Can anyone tell me anything about the machine that they use to hold the dies that strike the blank planchets or coins? Do they use one machine and do the use it for all denominations? For what i have seen on all coins they have been using one machine during or at the start of the wheat cent until we come up to the maybe 2009 or 2010 cent there had to be some kind of change with in the machine or a different settings to the strikes. I am not sure it could be a different in process of creating these coins. I am talking about all coins. I dont know if u s make coins for other countries but i can see that there are similar findings on those coins also. About the way the words and the layout of design are placed on a coin is very smart it......
The most expensive 1972 DDO Lincoln cent in the 70s was nothing more then MD .. I keep all new errors, who knows what error experts will think of 20 years from now ...
In the 80s, the mints started minted coins with whats known as " Single Squeeze Hubbing " and that changed everything ...
Thanks for stopping by and giving a good anwser, not my thread, but most of the replies here are useless and nothing more then being smart asses ...
I don't know if everyone know this, but within the last 10 yrs or so, the grading companies ( Pcgs ) started adding PL and DMPL to grading Morgan Dollars .
The OP have used much better English in other threads, so I know he can write in a manor that folks can understand. It's tough to get good answers when no one understands the question.
I don't think he was looking for a good anwser, but an educated anwser on error coins . Sometimes you have to read between the lines, at the wee hours of the morning for what being posted late night on cointalk ...
1959-D 1¢ WRPM-003 Description: D and totally separated D punched into the lower 9. Cross References: Crawford: CRPM-008, Coppercoins: 1959D-1MM-021 Top 100 RPM: Wexler Comments: Not all die variety specialists agree that this is an RPM variety with some arguing that it is some form of damage. An overlay by Billy G. Crawford shows that the suspected errant mint mark punch does conform to the shape of the D mint mark. The viewers will have to orm their own opinions regarding this variety, especially if a purchase is being considered. I'll back the OP crap up ... Your welcome too, OP ...