Really? Unfortunately, older than you. Now, c'mon give me a fact that disproves the fact that these coins/sets have been winners.
Read the whole freakin' thread. Come on now; any literate person with basic reasoning skills should be able to ascertain this for himself/herself. What is the current state of SQG's "comprehensive" theory of moderns? That does't sound like a number to me.
I have read the tread, especially your posts, and I haven't seen you cite any relevant facts. Most on here know exactly what the facts (not theories) are and have bought this next probable winner.
As those who have held on to other moderns long term (and far too long) will tell you: Edited to clarify: I don't mean to attack all moderns; just the gimmicky stuff the Mint is churning out in the last 10-15 years which will almost all be saved in PF69-PF70 DCAM condition, etc.
Yeah, that 1995-w proof ASE I just sold really opened my eyes. I'm not disputing there are mint products that lose, just not these types of cons/sets. I'd hate for people to listen to this BS about all mint products and lose out or have to buy them at much higher prices down the road. The stuff the mint has been turning out in the last 20 years has been at record low mintages, so regardless of the grade they will be scarce. Better to speculate on this stuff, rather than rolls of coins made in the hundreds of millions or billions.
I tell you what, you trolls can have this thread. I've better things to do than debate the insane. Good luck convincing the rest in here they shouldn't buy these sets.
A modest winner- not as good as I expected. I guess the humble Roosevelt is more humble than I thought. Well on to the next one