This looks like a lamination split to me

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by tomfiggy, Jun 28, 2015.

  1. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    Here are the pics..
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    i'd say ur right..
     
  4. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    You're correct, although lamination, as frequently describes the separation of material from the planchet or from the struck coin in our industry, is a misnomer.

    Laminating is the bonding together of multiple separate pieces of material.

    When laminated materials become separated, that should be described as delamination.

    It's probably too late to get the majority to change after using the wrong form of the word for so many years.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  5. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    Delamination then.
    Thank you. At least I found something in that box. Haha
    Is it worth anything?
     
  6. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    as with any minor error, its worth whatever somebody is willing to pay for it, or just ask yourself, what would you pay for it?
     
  7. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Interesting point. Would "lamination error" still be considered acceptable as a replacement for delamination?
     
  8. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    You might get 50 cents for it, but lamination errors are found quite often so unless you can stick a toothpick between the delaminated spot and the coin, you probably won't get much for it. I keep all my laminated coins, however.
     
  9. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    as explained on error-ref --- The term “lamination error” is grammatically incorrect as the metal is actually delaminating. While “delamination error” would be the proper term, we’re stuck with the terminology we’ve inherited from previous researchers. so lamination error it is....
     
  10. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    I Googled "delamination error" and got a few hits. I Googled "lamination error" and got hundreds LOL....
    I looked around one dollar maybe. It's something to collect I suppose.
     
  11. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Lamination is defined as: the bonding together of thin layers of materials to form a composite material

    So I don't see why "lamination error" couldn't also work since the bonding didn't work right and the materials failed to create a composite material.
     
  12. Jim M

    Jim M Ride it like ya stole it

    actually by definition, would it not be called a lamination Error? If its supposed to be laminated and it is, then life is good, should the lamination fail it becomes an error.

    Play on words is all I see here.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  13. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    I agree, I'm curious to hear the responses.
     
  14. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I can't tell form the images if it is a delamination error or a split plating bubble error. If the split goes down into the zinc core it's a delamination error. If it doesn't it is just a plating error.
     
  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    It is a 1977 cent. It is not plated.
     
  16. tomfiggy

    tomfiggy Well-Known Member

    Fellow numismatists pennies were 100% copper before 1982. No plating bubbles before then. It's definitely separated from the layer underneath.
     
  17. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Duh, I looked at the close ups of the lamination on the reverse and saw the 1984 D on the avatar and thught the op coin was an 84.
     
    ken454 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page