Time in Circulation

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by NSP, Jun 24, 2015.

  1. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Remind me, is that piece 99.99% gold or 90%?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    0.9167 actually, so very close to what standard US gold was.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  4. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Wonder how 99.99% would have worn?
     
  5. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    If I ever get hold of a cheap, impaired Kennedy gold proof, I'll let you know after a few years. ;)

    Then again, I've been carrying an ASE around for at least two years now, and it's showing almost no wear. I thought with .999 silver being softer than coin silver, I would've seen results by now. I guess I must not fidget with it enough.
     
  6. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    I know I have had friends from India who have told me that you can't wear "pure" gold chains because the rubbing against your skin will wear them away until they break. 22k gold is popular in India...hmmm...(22/24)(100)=91.67%
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    There's no question that 90-92% gold wears better than pure gold, that's why they make it. But even pure gold or pure silver isn't as soft as most think it is. Coins were made out of pure gold for hundreds of years, and their durability was just fine.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page