Oh No. And it it a proof as well. How embaressing. I pray that you are not correct, with all due respect.
Better than the gap between AM or the initials, IMO, is font style. Look again at the image @Hommer posted. Notice the A: On the WAM, the A is skinnier with the slanted vertical bars at a steeper angle. The left bar is much thinner than the right, giving the central triangle an off center look to it. On the CAM, the A is wider with the slanted vertical bars having a less extreme angle. The left bar is only slightly thinner than the right, allowing for a more centered appearance to the inner triangle. This is just my personal observations. It works better for me than taking a micrometer to the gap or troubling myself to magnify the initials.
Truly there are great vicissitudes in temper and decorum on this forum. It is truly a pity. One might indeed feel both insulted and encouraged from reply to reply. I will agree that, since it has no s on it that it can not be a proof, or that which I believed a proof to be. But the utterly uncalled for curt and rude demeanor of some members is frightening. On the other hand, I must thank those new acquaintances who have found the decency to offer kindness and even humility within their replies. Have a nice day. "Remember not only to say the right thing in the right place, but far more difficult still, to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment". (Quote by - Benjamin Franklin)
It is not rude to answer with a very brief comment, it is merely precise. not everyone feels the need to"sympathize" with a stranger that has just finding out what he thinks is a big find actually isn't