Reverse proof Roosevelt dime most significant coin of century.

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by bkozak33, May 4, 2015.

  1. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Fat chance. This is the "I gotta have mine now" phase.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Maybe. I don't know, many, including myself, not that I have them graded, only got one 70 set out of five. If the pop comes out low for 70's, they could carry a big premium. Anyone know what the TPG'er populations are so far?
     
  4. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    If the 1916-D could talk: "They're hot with ram induction but it's understood I got a fuel-injected engine sittin' under my hood." ;)
     
  5. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Too early for enough of a representative sample on this one, but most of the near equivalent coins lately hover around 50% 70's. In fact, that lends credence to my "con flip" theory, doesn't it? Huh.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  6. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    If the 1916-d could talk, it would be begging these two 2015 dimes to let it hangout with them.
     
  7. re-collect

    re-collect Active Member

    So very true. Collectors with any degree of compulsive behavior can't stand to wait for a possible shakeout in pricing. I'm fairly level headed, (at least I think I am), but too have displayed impatience when needing to acquire the last coin to complete a set.
     
  8. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    You know Eddie, you should let your subliminal thoughts guide you. Just the fact that you compare the 1916-d to these two 2015 dimes says volumes.
     
  9. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    And the sky on your planet is what color?
     
  10. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Very true, but, rationally, you should only pay current prices if you believe you won't be able to buy it for less later.
     
  11. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Is this a trick question? Blue, of course.
     
  12. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    We feel your pain, brother. [bites his lower lip in the Clintonesque empathy gesture style]
     
  13. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    I believe I'll be able to buy almost any coin I'll ever be able to afford for less later. So I buy just for kicks. I never count on any coin going up, unless it's in the glossy catalog category, where the obscenely wealthy (the other economy) play.
     
  14. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Really? Just about every modern I bought over the last 30 years is up, some way up. My classic 1916-d is down, so I kinda don't like it right now.
     
  15. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Different story. I'm talking from here on. I am bearish on the whole hobby. It's pure macroeconomics.
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
  16. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Well, I'm bearish on the classics, although some will set new records. The moderns are hotter than ever online, where apparently most collectors buy & sell these days.
     
  17. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    We're in a slow-motion dive into where stamp collecting went.
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
  18. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Could be. If it happens, hope I'm in the game for the recovery. If the mint goes there, what happens? They lose on all these products, so they stop making them or they revert back to only high mintage proof & mint sets? Sure will be nice holding all these new keys.
     
  19. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Wait, do you mean they're finally retiring the Roosevelt design?

    I feel like there's a big difference between "acquire the last coin to complete a set" and "acquire the latest coin to complete a set".
     
  20. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    With stamps, yeah, they flooded the market with new products, but weren't they all super high production. Not the case for coins, very low production.
     
  21. re-collect

    re-collect Active Member

    What I meant was what I wrote: "acquire the last coin to complete a set" Not sure why you interpreted that as a reference to Roosevelt dimes.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page