I've got mail - 1918 Lincoln Commemorative (PCGS)

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by razorblaydesjr, May 20, 2015.

  1. razorblaydesjr

    razorblaydesjr Active Member

    This one is PCGS graded but wanted to see what others would grade this in their collection compared to the TPG.

    This one burst with luster and is one of my favorite coins right now!

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Rassi, BadThad, dwhiz and 3 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    I'd rate it a '64.......
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  4. thetracer

    thetracer Active Member

  5. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I'm at MS65.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  6. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    I'd say a strong 64, very beautiful
     
  7. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I'd go either AU-58 or MS-64 . I think I see a little shine on the high areas , but a beautiful coin .
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  8. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    haha, that's quite the spread!
     
  9. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I keep my behind covered . lol
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  10. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

  11. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

  12. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    If being technical about it, not really... as the lower unc grades would be removed from consideration (not in response to the OP's coin, but in general).
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  13. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    64+. The big ding near his mouth prevented me from saying 65. Nice coin. :)
     
  14. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    And there we have it, goys and birls - THE reason technical grading is inadequate and dying away. The jump from 58 to 64 makes infinite sense in a technical grading world, but not the modern market grading world.

    In the modern world an otherwise 64 with a nearly imperceptible rub becomes a 63 or a 62, not a 58. Some may call it grade inflation. I call it eliminating nonsense.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  15. razorblaydesjr

    razorblaydesjr Active Member

    Thanks for taking a look and putting in what you would grade this as in your collection. It is graded as an MS 63, but I think it could have a shot at 64. The marks are not nearly as distracting as they show in my super large photos! lol.

    [​IMG]
     
    Seattlite86 and C-B-D like this.
  16. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Interesting grade
     
  17. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I'll say. I had it at MS65. You win some, you lose some. I guess...
     
  18. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    What do I win?
     
  19. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    After hearing the grade, I'd have to say @rzage saw what he thinks he saw, but was wrong about the impact on the grade. I especially like the fields on this, and maybe I'm the mutant in the room, but I applaud the demise of old-school technical grading.
     
  20. razorblaydesjr

    razorblaydesjr Active Member

    Well you called it @C-B-D... so I guess you won 1st place! Unfortunately, there's no prize attached :(
     
    rzage and C-B-D like this.
  21. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I would never give a coin with that little wear an AU grade , the field would have to have what I call circulation dings . I also don't think you're the mutant in the room as I like the tpgs grading as sporadic as it can be , better then the hodgepodge ways of yesterday . But I think you underestimate the collectors who did fine even back then as we knew when to call a spade a spade . If there was some disagreement all one did was not buy or sell the said coin . But the reason for my spread was you never know on a certain coin what the tpgs will give .
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page