1945 Lamination?

Is this a lamination error

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

too far away to tell..

 

Ok I will get close ups

 

Hello can you please respond

 

looks like it could be lamination, a close up of the entire coin would have been better...

 

Ok on it

 

I posted you a picture of the whole coin in clseup

 

Hi I'm sorry I might be bugging you but is it a lamination I need to know

 

Yes I say it is an lamination issue

 

Quite possibly, could we see a picture of the reverse also. There's a reason but I'll not say unless I see what I'm looking for. Post even if you don't see anything.

 

Ok I don't see anything on the reverse however I guess I don't know what to look for

 

I replied a photo of the reverse for you

 

I believe that is a lamination error. It almost looks like a retained cud but the reverse should be weak in the same area if it were. The missing lam. around the ear is a dead giveaway.

 

Wait so the missing Omanis a dead giveaway of the lamination error or a cud error

 

Sorry meant to say lam not whatever that word is

 

The Omanis don't collect US coins. They only collect oil and camels.

The coin looks like a lamination error, but I'm not 100% positive. I HATE collecting pennies!

 

Yeah auto correct turned lam into Omanis I don't even know what an Omanis

 

In the first photos that you showed, the area aaround the date appears to be raised. That could have been a retained cud, but for it to be cud, the reverse would have shown weaknesses in the same area because the striking pressure wouldn't be as great in that area. All of the evidence including the missing lamination around the ear draws one conclusion.