1972 Washington Toner - Thoughts?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by phankins11, Dec 15, 2014.

?

Is the obverse toning of this 1972 Quarter artificial or genuine

  1. AT

  2. Genuine

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    I guess a GTG would be in order becaus I'm curious what others think about it. But also what do you think of the toning? I realize the toning patter is distracting to some degree...but the more I look at this coin the more cool I think it is.

    And lets do one more thing...take a vot

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. deacon2828

    deacon2828 Active Member

    The obverse looks like it is in plastic ?
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  4. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    @deacon2828 - A fellow Hoosier! Where 'bouts are you located? I'm in the Daleville area
     
  5. deacon2828

    deacon2828 Active Member

  6. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    Ok..very familiar with that area. I lived in Indianapolis for about 14 years (5 on the far west side of Greenfield (21st an German Church), then 5 in Fishers.
     
  7. deacon2828

    deacon2828 Active Member

    My Grandsons live in Greenfield, 1 daughter lives in Shelbyville, 1-lives in Beechgrove. My wife an I are both Southsiders ! I am very familiar with Daleville too.
     
    phankins11 likes this.
  8. cladking

    cladking Coin Collector

    The toning is common in mint sets. I believe it's caused by the inner layer of plastic.
     
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  9. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Agreed, it looks like the toning is from plastic.
     
  10. d.t.menace

    d.t.menace Member

    It's perfect for the era. Somewhere there's an old hippie that would dig it.:cool:
     
    phankins11 likes this.
  11. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    It almost appears to be a film, or even PVC.
     
  12. cladking

    cladking Coin Collector


    Yes. These old (pre-1985) envelopes had an interior liner with PVC in them. This is a common look for mint set coins. The '72-D is often a superb Gem with this kind of toning or tarnish. Most of them can be saved with a soak in acetone or 91% isopropyl alcohol. The best bet is a 50: 50 mixture. A little denatured alcohol will take care of other problems that sometimes show up.
     
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I don't know if its AT or NT, but its ugly and not market acceptable. That's all you really need to know.
     
    Lehigh96 and Coinchemistry 2012 like this.
  14. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    @cladking knows his stuff! This was in a mint cello pack. I pulled it out.

    I like it, and if I like it, then I'm sure others do. I can appreciate @physics-fan3.14 's opinion, but I don't find it ugly...just different.
     
  15. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Hey, to each his own. That's the beauty of this hobby - collect what you like, and in the end it doesn't really matter what I think.
     
  16. deacon2828

    deacon2828 Active Member

    Told ya plastic !!
     
    phankins11 likes this.
  17. phankins11

    phankins11 Well-Known Member

    It's on the coin actually has luster to it...need to see if I can get a pic that shows it
     
  18. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    +1

    That said, I voted for AT because there was no option for "not market acceptable"
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page