My new Trajan AE As 27mm, 12.96g Rome Obverse: IMP CAES NERVA TRAIAN AVG GERM P M, Laureate head of Trajan right. Reverse: TR POT COS IIII P P S C, Victory walking left hlding shield inscribed S P Q R. RIC434 I really like the reverse...looks like Victory is driving hard for the hoop! And check out those wings!
If real, it is a nice coin! I have doubts though, does anyone else? The "melty" way the devices join the flan, the portrait style... I don't see it in Forvm's fake list or on forgerynetwork so hopefully I'm wrong. I've certainly been wrong many times before
I thought the same when I first looked at it, but wasn't certain so I wanted to wait till someone else responded more knowledgeable then I. The portrait seems wrong and the detail seems just too good. JBG, don't take anything I say to the bank. Wait till others chime in. I'm as likely to be wrong as I am right.
I won't take it to the bank, just back to the guy who sold it! I'm a good complainer. What think ya'll?
Hate to say it, but at first glance I was slightly dubious too. Not that I have much experience with Trajan, but the style seems a little off, for me the reverse. And the way the edge of Victory's dress overlaps the last P on the reverse seems abit odd. Hope we're all wrong about it!
Hi JBG ... man, I sure hope that your cool new coin turns out to be a winner (I suck at the fake-spotting game) => here is one of my Trajan examples
I don't consider myself qualified to comment on the authenticity of your OP coin JBGood. But I'll add my Trajan to the mix. Trajan; 98-117 AD Bronze; AS 27mm/10.4g OBV: IMP CAES NERVA TRAIAN AVG GERM PE Laureate Bust Draped R REV: TR POT COS III PP Victory walking L holding shield w SQOR inscribed and palm (RIC 417, Cohen 628)
We need Doug, Pierre, Martin, John Anthony to weigh in on this authenticity-wise. I can take it guys! I bought a $10K diamond once that....never mind.
I don't either, what I'm pointing out is distinct nose shape variation on all the portraits. Mine looks too small compared to most I think.
Hard to be sure just from the pics, but I too would tend toward authentic... The coin look struck to me, details are strong, devices are sharp... At first glance I also thought that the style (reverse) was "off", but comparing with others, it seems quite ok... Did not find any others from the same dies though... A detail that, to me, is somehow important... The reddish spot on Trajan cheek, a common type of deposits on "real" ancients... The coin might have been repatinated also, more or less recently, something that could give it its "not perfectly natural look"...