Dime book from a smoker

I guess you will have to roll the dice and figure how you want to die.
"Acetone is produced and disposed of in the human body through normal metabolic processes. It is normally present in blood and urine." If you are right, everyone will die from the cancer due to the acetone present in all living humans. And the only time we are not producing acetone is when we are DEAD. Hmmmm! Damned if we do and damned if we don't - according to you.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

And when you develop eye cancer because of all the highly-toxic LCD rays* coming off your screen while you're typing all this, treatment will cost you just as much. Unless you want to die blind and insolvent, you should turn off the computer/tablet/phone RIGHT NOW, and never, ever use it again.

*There is little actual evidence of carcinogenicity from LCD rays -- almost as little as the evidence of carcinogenicity from acetone.

 

BTW, my cancer treatment only cost $58,000 and my wife's only cost $68,000 and we both spent over 3 weeks in the hospital. I guess it was due to that acetone we were producing by living, huh? I had the number one killer and she had the number 2 killer, but we are both producing more acetone.

 

how about just keep it the way you found it

 

then why would you work with bad chemical again, not says acetone gave you cancer, but cancer is cased from a carcinogen, so something gave you cancer

 

Not necessarily so. Many times it is just in your system. And I never said I worked "with bad chemical". I said my body is still producing acetone. It is part and parcel of living. If I were not producing acetone, I would be dead. I have a preference for producing acetone.

 

true, but that not what were talking about, its just like formaldehyde, I had the same argument, that you are arguing. Heres what were talking about, and how I won my argument with formaldehyde, were talking about commercial made product, not natural, and that how I won, and why things get made a carcinogen

 

you do know all cancer is caused from a carcinogen

 

No, they are not. Ever hear of BRCA1, BRCA2, BRCA3, MLH1, MSH2, MLH3, MSH6, PMS1, PMS, TGFBR2, etc.

 

You write a lot like Kurt Vonnegut.

 

tell me what your pathology says, I'll pull out the 12 report on carcinogens, and I'll tell you what caused your cancer

 

my was mixed germ-cell ( germicide )

 

Can you tell us more about your "argument with formaldehyde"?

If you were in a situation where you were exposed to excessive levels of formaldehyde, I hope you raised holy not-on-50s-TV about it. The stuff is irritating and toxic even at extremely low levels, and yes, it's a known carcinogen.

If you argued that your cancer was caused by formaldehyde exposure -- well, I'm not sure how you'd prove that scientifically, but I have no problem with assigning legal liability there. I'd expect you to win in court, and that suits me just fine.

For acetone, though, there just isn't anything to suggest that it causes cancer. That's where our disconnect is. Sure, you should avoid chemicals that cause cancer -- but acetone isn't one of them.

 

easy, test the tumors

 

don't worry, they have tests, to test the tumors

 

I will take that as a complement, but I don't think it is deserved even though we went to the same school.

 

Yep! They can tell exactly what cancer it is - but not what caused it. However, they absolutely can associate many cancers with your genes.

 

you have no ideal what your talking about, they can test tumors, and tell you what caused them, the name of the test is ??? come on rim cent, you should no this, your a cancer survivor, and if you don't no the anwser, let me know, I'll tell you the name of the test

 

I believe that since formaldehyde is commonly found in interstellar space it would be considered 'natural'