I'm going to say MS63. I don't think there is any wear...just the typical 1921 poor strike. I see a few dings...especially those right on the focal area in the neck which I think will keep it from grading any higher. However, 1921 Peace Dollars are notoriously hard to grade...so I may be way off.
I always thought that the '21 was a weak strike, thus why I sent this coin in to get graded. I believed that it was a high grade with a weak strike, and when comparing it to a 64 that I have graded the fields looked A LOT better, but the strike on the 64 was a lot better.
AU58 Yes, the '21's have weak strikes, but the eagle's leg on the reverse looks like it exhibits wear. It's tough to tell as the photo's are slightly out of focus.
Plenty of easily seen wear on her hair and on the right side of the eagle. Great looking Peace Dollar and my favorite year of the series. I'd have to give it an AU55.
It was graded MS61 bt NGC. I thought that it was undergraded because it was a weak strike, but I guess they gave it the 61 because they couldnt decide if it was wear or a weak strike. Lol
Well I am glad it got the MS grade. After following this thread and the comments about wear, however minimal or weak strike, I think we have our answer. It is weak not wear...otherwise no MS grade correct?
Very nice coin. Looks better than 61. From PCGS: In fact, fewer than 10 1921 Peace dollars out of 1,000 are very sharply struck. As the PCGS, NGC, ANACS, etc., certification services do not insist upon sharp strike as a pre-requisite to high grade, chances are excellent that a certified MS-63, 64, or 65 coin may be weakly struck, at least on the obverse.
IMO i thought it was going to get a 64 or 65 before I sent it in, dealers also agreed with me that it looked like a 64-65
I know I'm late to this thread but I just voted MS63. It appears to be an atrtractive MS coin with weak strike. Here is an NGC MS64 from my collection. My old photo doesn't accurately depict the in-hand luster & light toning.