Mercury Dime: Full Bands? Yes or No?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Apr 1, 2014.

?

Does this Mercury Dime have full bands?

  1. Yes (FB)

    83.3%
  2. No

    16.7%
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Does this Mercury Dime have full bands? The coin is graded by PCGS but I don't feel like divulging the date/mm or grade. Please vote in the attached poll.

    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome!

    Paul
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I voted yes , the line is unbroken as far I can see . Seems like a week strike on the vertical and diagonal lines though .
     
  4. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    I don't know, looks like there's some weakness & hits to the trough, which according to the PCGS definition would mean, not full bands.
     
  5. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    noway to tell its theses 3 bands 777.jpg
     
  6. Timewarp

    Timewarp Intrepid Traveler

    We need to see the two other horizontal bands to grade it.
     
  7. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm thinking PCGS only looks at the center bands.
     
    rzage and Rick Stachowski like this.
  8. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I don't pretend to know what PCGS says, (so won't vote in poll), but when I used to collect these things I wouldn't call this FSB. Too soft a strike IMHO.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Correct, PCGS only looks at the center band, NGC looks at all three bands. Neither one of them have any requirements regarding the vertical lines of the fasces for a coin to get the designation.

    That said, based on the PCGS requirements, I'd have to say that yes this coin meets their requirements. The center band is clear and distinct, and there are no breaks that cross the center line.

    Personally, I disagree with the PCGS requirements and favor the NGC standard.
     
    micbraun likes this.
  10. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    My guess is PCGS said they were not full bands even though I voted yes. I do not see why else this would be posted.
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I kinda wonder as well Dick, but maybe Paul thinks it shouldn't be and it is and that's why he posted it. Could go either way as to why he did.
     
  12. cremebrule

    cremebrule Active Member

    I think it could go either way, depending on the date/mm. If it was a year known for strong strikes, then I don't think PCGS would grant it FB status. Conversely, if it was a date such as 1945 P or a early semi/key date, then I think PCGS would give it FB. The only issue I have is the center part of the band, which appears to have some slight mushing together and chatter -- though, it may just be my eyes and/or the pixelated nature of my screen, haha :)
     
  13. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    The other bands are full.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I would say FSB , but I wouldn't buy it for the weakness to the rest of the facses .
     
  15. swageatsyou

    swageatsyou New Member

    I saw yes. There are no hits across the bands and they are clearly split


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  16. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    So Paul , are they full , It looks like it's in a PCGS slab , what did they think ?
     
  17. Slider

    Slider Member

    Looks like FSB's to me. Incidentally, on the NGC vs PCGS standard, is it common to find a merc that has a full split in the center band but not full splits in the top and bottom bands (outside of damage after the strike)? My impression has been that PCGS only uses the center band because it would be highly unusual to have a full split there and no full split on the other bands. Perhaps my impression is wrong.
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It happens often enough.

    PCGS has more lenient standards than NGC for every special designation there is.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page