ANACS grades these, and it probably would be worth it, as this is probably a $4,000 item. Here's a similar one currently being sold on eBay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Casascius-M...56?pt=Coins_US_Individual&hash=item23371c4a40
Holy Bits! So much for my snide remark. I haven't paid any attention to this phenomenon and had no idea.
Ha! You Bitcoiners will be going to the re-education camp after we Shibes (Dogecoin) take over. Crypto feudal wars! Much Wow!
Can I buy it off you using virtual money? J/K Great find! Put it up on eBay, I bet the bidding goes very high. TC
Yeah, here's the article. That should boost the value. https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=27633&sa=U&ei=t5wfU925AYi6kQex1oDABw&ved=0CBAQFjAC&sig2=y0wZOPnmre3TpOWifwYnUA&usg=AFQjCNFWBaqt0_WzrKIstsRdbhOqw-2uug
Based on the pictures you've posted, it looks to me like you have the second issue where the error was corrected. On the first series the name was spelled CASACIUS rather than CASASCIUS. In your pictures, it looks like the second spelling rather than the error. That's what I got after reading the Wiki page anyway. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Casascius_physical_bitcoins