Which 1915 S $5 Matches Which Slab?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by LostDutchman, Feb 26, 2014.

  1. torontokuba

    torontokuba Thread Crapper & Hijacker, TP please.

    You had me worried there for a while. You liked a comment that states coin 1 is MS 62 and that both coins are AU. Thought you, as the dealer, had little faith in an accurate MS grade.

    Screen shot 2014-02-27 at 2.07.50 PM.png
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    Absolutely Matt, and if I had them and sent them in I would be tickled to get them back like that. My point is that we play guess the grade games here quite a bit and even then not everyone comes to the same consensus. I guess it probably boiled down to which one each person preferred...beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but the ask/bid is on the greysheet. :)
     
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Huh ?

    The TPGs, and CAC, each get paid the same flat fee no matter what the coin grades. The TPGs grade the way they do because of their grading standards. So where is there any additional profit for them by over-grading ? The value of the coin doesn't play into it unless the TPG thinks the submitter deliberately under-valued the coin on his submission form. Otherwise, the submitter's fees are determined by the grading tier he chooses, and his stated value on his submission form. The more valuable the coin the higher the fees.

    As for those who think the coins, both in this case, are really AU, over the past 5 or 6 years there have been several articles written, and published both in the coin mags and on-line, by ex-professional graders, current professional graders, and others recognized as experts when it comes to grading, that have all claimed that yesterday's AU coins are today's MS61, 62, and 63 coins.

    Do you really think they are all wrong when they all say the same thing ? I certainly don't because I was saying it long before any of them did !

    The PCGS grading book even states flat out that PCGS will grade coins with light wear as high as MS67. They use the excuse that the light wear present on the coins may, repeat may, have been caused by roll friction, album friction, flip friction, and/or cabinet friction. Of course they refuse to recognize that it also may have been caused by wear from circulation. There is no way to tell one kind of wear from another. Wear from any of those things looks exactly the same as all of the others. Wear is wear in other words - regardless of what caused it.

    So if you want to know what the TPGs are doing, they are giving their customers what they want. They are grading AU coins as MS because that makes their customers happy.
     
    medjoy likes this.
  5. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    Haha! The like was actually in appreciation of Doug's old fashioned stance.
     
    torontokuba likes this.
  6. torontokuba

    torontokuba Thread Crapper & Hijacker, TP please.

    Agreed. I can guess miles away on just a photo and a raw coin. What I don't understand is how you get AU, when MS-62 CAC and MS-63 CAC are already staring you in the face, at the very beginning of the guess the grade game?

    If I am at the early stages of my adventure with imported US slabs from the most reputable sources (which I am), do I disregard the opinions of PCGS, NGC and CAC for what a Numismatist or an Expert says? It seems to be a direct contradiction of solid evidence as to the grade. We're not undermining the subjective opinions of forum members regarding a raw coin. The AU opinion undermines a top TPG with a reinforcement from CAC, no?
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2014
  7. ROLLJUNKIE

    ROLLJUNKIE Active Member

    The TPG's are putting a coin in a slab and writing on a piece of paper and sticking it in there. Only the market losing faith in them will change anything. If someone working at PCGS wanted to buy the 62 and put a 63 piece of paper in there, he/she may have just realized a 14K profit. 14K for changing a number on a piece of paper, almost like the difference between a one and hundred dollar note...
     
    torontokuba likes this.
  8. torontokuba

    torontokuba Thread Crapper & Hijacker, TP please.

    Happy returning customers, isn't that in the interest of getting more business and hence more profit?

    I think AU is wrong, as far as these two coins are concerned. That's a minimum 3 and 4 grade point mistake you're implying.

    It is a pretty soft metal.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2014
  9. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    OK...I guess they just don't look completely smooth to me. But, I have to admit...I don't have the best computer monitor. I thought they looked a little rough.

    Matt, I'm curious. In hand do you agree that coin 1 is MS63 and coin 2 is MS62? I really thought coin 2 was the better example.
     
  10. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I think it's a little more complicated than that. The coins are looked at by 3 separate graders...one personal alone doesn't have that ability. The market dictates how the TPGs grade...not the other way around.
     
  11. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I think his point is...those causes of "friction" are wear and if a coin has wear the best it can grade is AU.
     
    rzage likes this.
  12. ROLLJUNKIE

    ROLLJUNKIE Active Member

    Do the three separate graders put their initials on the slab somewhere so you can tell who reviewed it?
     
  13. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm sure PCGS has some kind of internal paperwork that shows who graded certain coins. I doubt such a thing is made public.
     
  14. torontokuba

    torontokuba Thread Crapper & Hijacker, TP please.

    Obviously not.
     
  15. ROLLJUNKIE

    ROLLJUNKIE Active Member

    Also, are you saying that people prefer potentially higher than accurate grades on their coins??? You are stretching here. :)
     
    torontokuba likes this.
  16. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm not stretching at all. The TPGs grade to what the market wants. The market has changed since the TPGs came into being in the mid 1980s and with that so has how they grade. I personally want coins graded accurately...the market as a whole as seems to be wanting more lenient standards.
     
  17. torontokuba

    torontokuba Thread Crapper & Hijacker, TP please.

    So, where do you get your coins graded, the basement of a local Numismatist or Expert?;) If you have any MS slabs that you're selling more accurately and honestly, let us know.
     
  18. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    I thought both pieces had a chance at 63... Coin #1 has slightly more luster on the reverse... I think that's what bumped it.
     
    torontokuba likes this.
  19. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I personally prefer PCGS...that said, I always grade the coin myself and I only what I think is fair. It's no secret that the TPGs have loosened their standards. There's no "honesty" about it...the market has dictated the change in standards.

    OK, that makes sense.
     
  20. ROLLJUNKIE

    ROLLJUNKIE Active Member

    I thought the smiley face would show my sarcasm. You taking pulls off the laughing gas or what?
     
  21. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I knew you were...I just wanted to make sure that what I said was clear for everybody else. As for the gas...I got today off. I'm nowhere near that stuff. :D
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page