Any chance this thing is real

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Old Error Guy, Feb 17, 2014.

  1. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    Congrats on a awesome error coin OldErrorGuy . I sure like this one.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    cointalkjpg.JPG Good clear images zoomed in on the boxed in areas could be helpful.
     
  4. Old Error Guy

    Old Error Guy Well-Known Member

  5. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    Cointalk Grid.jpg I can't say with absolute assurance that what is present on the obverse and reverse was produced by the same die but I see nothing to indicate they were produced by different dies. A pounding or squeeze job requires two coins and the odds of both coins being produced by the same working die is very low.
     
  6. jay4202472000

    jay4202472000 Well-Known Member

    Great illustration Justafarmer! Thanks for producing this. It looks like you may be a tad bit more than just a farmer! Nice evidence.
     
  7. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    Thanks but nothing difficult really. Imported the image into a CAD system. Established an angular construct (the white dotted lines you see) along the outside edge of the "1" in the date. Then used the parallel and perpendicular line drawing tools to produce the grids.
     
  8. d.t.menace

    d.t.menace Member

    Isn't that groove an impression from the rim? It looks to me that there were two separate impressions. The partial motto you see is from the same impression as the partial rim. The motto is out of alignment and rotated with respect to the bust. This could only occur if the brockage maker were double struck? And one strike was out of the collar.
     
  9. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

    I don't think that is a rim that goes with the reverse profile hit, everything is pretty well centered, that thing is from something else.
     
  10. d.t.menace

    d.t.menace Member

    The partial motto doesen't fit with the bust on the reverse either. Look at where WE is on the obverse, then look at where it's at on the reverse impression. That's why I said there are two different impressions. The bust and the partial date and LIBERTY are one impression and the rim impression and the partial motto are a second impression.
    cointalkjpg.JPG
     
  11. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    You're quite right about IGWT being out of position. I don't have an explanation.
     
  12. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    Mike like I said back in post #14 this looks like the brockage maker may have been a worn die cap that came loose from the obv. die and somehow landed on the rev. die. it may have been a floating die cap that was moving out of position between strikes. the ridge in the face may have been a bend in the die cap where it was starting to wear thin. I'm about like you , this is the only thing I can think of right now. it is definately a mint error IMO , just a little hard to exactly figure it out.
     
  13. d.t.menace

    d.t.menace Member

    Before you can say this is definitely a mint error you still have to explain the double impressions the brockage maker received before it became a die cap.
    By the way this die cap would have been on the reverse die, not on the obverse die.
     
    non_cents likes this.
  14. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    hey don't worry I'm betting Mike will figure it out. yes we all know it was on the reverse die when the op's coin was struck , like I said earlier I believe the brockage maker may have been a loose obv. die cap that was moving out of place between strikes then somehow flipped over and landed on the rev. die.

    this is just my guess so don't take it to heart until it is finally solved.
     
  15. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    You can send the coin to me at no charge for a closer look. Maybe I can figure out what's going on at that point.
     
  16. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    This kind of reminds me of a 2000 cent with a first-strike or early-stage counterbrockage of the obverse design on the obverse face. In that coin, the first digit of the date overlaps the front of Lincoln's coat. I have not figured that one out, either.
     
  17. rascal

    rascal Well-Known Member

    so many freak things can happen at the mint that some of them are hard to figure out. I think I may have figured out what made the sunken in area in front of Lincoln's face. It looks like the collar may have sheared part of the edge off the brockage maker off and was laying on it when the op's coin was struck. just something to think about if you examine the coin.
     
  18. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    errorcadjpg.JPG The triangle connecting points on LIBERTY, DATE and Bust (The red triangle) appear similar on both impressions while the triangle connecting points on LIBERTY, Date and WE (the black triangle) are NOT similar.
    So the positioning of WE relative to the Date and LIBERTY on the reverse is not the same as on the obverse. The positioning of the Bust relative to the Date and Liberty on the reverse appears to be the same as on the obverse.
     
  19. Clutchy

    Clutchy Well-Known Member

    I see absolutely no issues with the obverse side of the coin. Does anyone see anything?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page