Pics of my 1970 s lg date, DDO-001 I hope?

I heard this one is rare also?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I have few of em.

 

And don't forget about the four 92 Close AMs, the two supposed "90 MM-001" that no one but you has ever seen or heard of, and god-knows what other amazing scarcities that are sure to be popping up here any day.

Perhaps I am reading you wrong (and if so I am sorry), but between this and the other debacle of a thread, it seems as if you're suffering from a severe case of pareidolia. There are very good reasons why certain varieties are rare and/or valuable, and the first is that they don't magically appear, no less in multiples, to one after digging through a few coins. I am not sure if you, perhaps, stumbled upon a certain shamefully titled book and took it a tad too seriously, or what the deal is, but if you're going to post, make all sorts of claims, and dismiss the opinions of those simply trying to help, you'll not get far and will most certainly be in for a rude awakening. Unfortunately for you, I am afraid that there will be no coin magazine articles or cheers of "Tim is the man" in the near future.

You're a rare one, Tim... of this I have no doubt, but good luck to you anyway.

 

I was talking about 1960 d/d, RPM.

 

Because I got a couple of those!

 

Lined em up on top of each other this time.

 

U wanna see the collection?

 

I count at least 3 different coins posted in this thread, with seemingly no connection to one another. It is hard enough to follow your train of thought for 1 coin, but then when you suddenly post 2 1960-D coins and then ask "is this rare" and post a 1982, it makes it nearly impossible to provide any help whatsoever in this thread.

To make things easier, how about limiting 1 thread per specific coin you have a question about. That organizes things and keeps threads on track. You might get better feedback on your coins this way.

 

Ill post all of em!

 

Sorry about that. I just needed info on my 1970 s and I got it. Sorry if u started the thread.

 

I didnt ask any questions on the 1960's.

 

I never said you asked questions about the 1960D coins...read my post again. I was referencing post 41 and 42.

 

There isnt a

Nope. Not at coppercoin.

 

Im looking at the s. Looks like only punched once. But if u look at the zero u can see a die gouge on top going to the east rim. DDO-001 Has it. And every other mark.

 

Sorry to whoevers trying to give me help with posting too many pics.

 

The only RPM's are proofs.

 

Too much confusion...I'm outta here.

 

Well I apologize for throwing in the 1960-D/D sm. date /large date DDO. I was trying to show what a type III DDO date would look like. mea culpa.

 

Tim, you didn't listen to what I said earlier. It doesn't matter about the marks if the doubling isn't present. Attributes change from die state to die state, but the doubling is there always.

 

By now all of you should have figured out that you are fighting a losing battle.

Ignorance is bliss, and the OP loves swimming in it. It's best to just let him live in his little dream world, as he is resistant to wanting to learn from those of us who actually know.

Just a reminder, he's never posted any updates on the other rarities he claims to have numerous examples of, and I doubt he will on this.

Someone will be totally disappointed when PCGS doesn't attribute anything because it's nothing but a cent, worth a cent.