1936 dd?

I only see doubling in the date? The last two shots are a different coin.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

No, no characteristics of any of the 3 main DDO for that year. MD.

Here is a photo of my 1936-DDO-1. Notice the doubling is rounded and about the same height as the the other portion. I put some green arrows on to help. Type DDO-2 looks similar but it has a "peg leg" R in LIBERTY.

 

I'm not sure yet, mine looks to be doubled almost perfectly on top of the other

 

If both parts of your date were the same height ( or very close to it) rather than one normal and one flattened, and also notice on mine how the date seem to be much thicker due to the doubling whereas yours doesn't.

 

I agree but yours is also offset making it wider

 

here is another in my coin book the nine is off but look at the difference between the threes. I will also move it to the top

 

nice find I have one it was quite awkward didn't match any of the cpg listings but it was on coppercoins.com

 

I think it is MD.

 

wrong kind of doubling , this one looks to be MD because of the flat shelf doubling

 

Its a double...It's a double!!!

 

both of them are doubles

 

yes but not doubleD

 

omg yes they are

 

got any photos?

 

poor man 55

 

MD. Usually the term is reserved for die deteriorated 1955 P cents, not these.

 

got a question does the type b reverse also apply to the proofs in the 56 quarter?

 

I spy...................Machine Doubling! Yep yep yep!

 

What would be the 55 d be then? and does it hold any value?

 

All the coins you have posted thus far in the thread show mechanical doubling and have little to no numismatic value.