The authors of this book have PhD's and over a century of combined experience in silver. The book is published by a reputable publishing house, and the authors have annotated the research in this book, and had their work, and original research, peer reviewed. There is no reason to disparage the book or the authors. And when you publish your book on this topic, I will buy that one and read it as well, even though you do not have the experience of professionally and publically currating such items, and despite that it will not likely have multi-disiplined peer review
Just go to the Liquor Store and get you a 1/5 of White Lightning and soak your coins it. After you are through and you have any left over save it for later or through it away because it is very bad stuff. You can also get a bottle of EverClear which is pure 110 proof alcohol but do with it like above they both work very good on Silver coins .
Regardless, cleaning coins is generally looked down upon in the hobby and in nearly all cases diminishes their value. Cleaning coins strips them of their original patina, a part of the coin which is highly desirable when making a purchase.
Q. David Bowers has about four pages in his book on cleaning coins and says " cleaning coins is a bad word wash your mouth with soap, conserving is a good even though are the same thing. Just practice on coins of little value over face.
Some of the best and most renown scientists in the world disagree with one another. The PhD designation is not a stamp of infallibility. The real world operates in a way that is not free of contradiction. As non_cents pointed out, nearly in all cases values are negatively affected by cleaning. If someone wants to clean their coins, please don't expect them to be worth much if you try to sell them. Maybe a new cult of collectors will be born, all who have this philosophy and they can buy and sell among themselves. It is what it is and the results favor non-cleaning.
If you were to ever look at two such coins in person, I believe you'd see the difference in an instant. But Air-Tites are not airtight, no coin holder is. And the cause of toning is the air itself, moisture content is but one component of the air. So the best any of us can hope for is to slow toning down, but it can never be stopped given what we have to work with now. That said, Air-Tites were my personal preference for coin holders. But along with a good holder you still have to utilize proper storage methods to have any hope of slowing toning down as much as you can. Yeah, it would help, but no such coin holder exists. And that's pretty common, lots of folks see things the same way you do. And that is also the reason why 80% or more of all older silver coins have been dipped at least once, and many of them more than once. But most who like "nice and shiny" don't realize that toning is inevitable. Stopping toning is like trying to negate gravity, it can't be done. But you can slow it down. Sure there is, it's called lacquer, shellac, varnish, and even lucite. And it is a method that was put into use by people who like "nice and shiny" long before you and I were born. It is also a method that people stopped using decades ago. That is because a coated coin is considered a damaged coin by just about everyone in the numismatic community. The only method accepted by the numismatic community is a quality coin holder and proper storage.
Fifty to sixty years ago harsh cleaning WAS the acceptable method. And it was the acceptable method for hundreds of years before that. It is only in recent years that harsh cleaning has been seen for what it is - harmful to coins. So to think that it may switch and go back the other way is extremely unlikely for the opposite is still happening. Typically it is only beginners and a few old timers who still practice harsh cleaning. And as more and more people become better educated about coins, more and more of them move away from harsh cleaning.
Yes I understand what you are saying, I was saying after all these years of "don't clean a coin under any circumstances" we now have The most knowledgeable , Numismatist still alive who actually agrees with cleaning coins or as he says "cleaning,Bad Word" "Conservation is a good word" even though they are the same thing! He does advise people that want to Clean/Conserve their coins to practice on coins of face value. Now you have several companies offering Conservation Service for a price! I take offense when someone tells me that I am not intelligent enough to understand and perform something as simple as cleaning a piece of metal in a safe manner,but we have been brainwashed for so long that we have bought into their argument so that now they can make a few Million $. I respect everyone's opinion on the subject. Do I agree with self cleaning/conserving all coins? No, I will not do it on coins that are rare or valuable for other reasons other than being rare.
No, you misunderstand. There are two things - cleaning, and harsh cleaning - and they are very different things. The problem is that when most people use the word "cleaning" what they really mean is "harsh cleaning". And that is what David Bowers is doing. Cleaning and conservation or clean and conserve are equals, they are synonyms. Can you or anybody else clean or conserve a coin themselves ? Sure, if you know how to do it correctly. Problem is the vast majority of people do not know how to do it correctly. So when they try what they end up doing is harshly cleaning the coin because of their lack of knowledge. There's no great mystery, it's just that are very, very, few acceptable methods for cleaning a coin. And they all have to be done correctly or the coin will be damaged. And since most people don't know how to do it correctly they prefer to pay somebody who does to do it for them. It's just like buying a suit of clothes or fixing your car, you can make the suit at home or fix the car in your driveway. But only if you know how. Most people don't. So they pay somebody to do it for them.
Ibuyit2 has a point though. The TPG's are quick to put the word "cleaned" in the label description if an individual performs it. They also have the words "lightly cleaned" and "harshly cleaned" in their arsenal and all are considered a negative to the buyer. They never say conserved except when they perform the service. They lead you to believe clean and conserve are not equals, they are not synonyms. They hide behind that labeling to stigmatize any attempt by collectors to lean the correct method. IMHO.
Yes I agree with what you are saying and respect your right to say it and I think I addressed the issue of different methods of cleaning/conserving a coin. I do not under any circumstance clean or suggest that anyone else use commercial silver dips,pastes or any other method that causes a silver coin to look shiny and slick, I don't recommend Tumblers or Sonic cleaners. Whizzing, or any form of cleaning/conserving that uses rubbing or brushing and do not suggest using ANY type of cleaning/conservation of coins with a value of $100.00 or more because regardless of how careful you are accidents will and do happen. Also I would not suggest that anyone try to clean/conserve a Proof coin. As far as toning goes I would never attempt to remove it but some collectors do not like it. I have coins that have been graded and encapsulated by all the big 3 TPGs that have started toning since encapsulation . If anyone has misunderstood my support for cleaning /conserving a coin to include polishing with silver cleaners or any other form of HARSH cleaning I am sorry I should have been more specific.
One other thing is that if you allow a TPGs to clean/conserve your coin they will not put it on the label saying "This coin has been Professionally Conserved or Cleaned" and they do have a disclaimer that if your coin is damaged in this process you will not hold them personally responsible! They are quick to add "Cleaned" "Improperly Cleaned" or "Harshly Cleaned".
Sorry, but that just isn't rue at all. There are literally tens of millions of coins that have been properly cleaned by individuals and then slabbed by NGC and PCGS. They could care less if an individual does it. The only thing they care about is that it is done properly. No, they never say conserved even when they do the conserving themselves. They never say it at all. No, that isn't true either. For example, if you look up the codes that PCGS uses on their slabs they very plainly say - harshly cleaned. 92|N-2 Cleaned – surface damage due to a harsh, abrasive cleaning 94|N-4 Altered Surface - Whizzed, harsh cleaning, thumbed over (using a pasty substance to cover defects or alter the appearance). The problem is people, collectors, do not make the distinction between the terms - harsh cleaning and cleaning. The TPGs do make the distinction, they use the correct term. Not true either, see above. Collectors need to educate themselves. Just because they think or believe something is true, that does not mean it is true.
I only know that I have gotten some past the TPGs but in other instances as far back as 2-3 years ago they would not even encapsulate a coin if they thought it had been cleaned. I can prose you that if they do the cleaning it will not have that designation on the label. When you get the coins back there will be a sheet of paper with the coins that contain the grades and on that paper they add "This coin chosen for conservation" that is the only place you will see it,it sure will not be on the label,but if you do it and get caught they will put that on the label and give you a Details grade! Look we are all grown men and women on this site,so tell me,if you submit your coin and voluntarily add "oh by the way I have already performed the Conservation on it myself"do you think they will grade the coin and never take into account that you have already done the Conservation. Don't say"well if the Conservation/Cleaning has been done properly they will". I think we all know that TPG is multimillion dollar service per year and as such there is no way that Mr. Joe Blow is going to start a grading service and be successful. You don't have the money to compete with them much less get an endorsement from the ANA. It's just like the Early Release program. Do you actually think the TPGs look at each and everyone of those coins? They barely have time to take them out of the packaging,print the labels,put them in the slabs,seal them and get them back to their customers! Money,Money,Money for them and their customers. I can wait 2-3 months,buy the same coin in the same grade but without the fancy label,take them both out of the slabs and no one can tell you which was minted first. I will get off the Bully Pulpit now but it just irks me that the TPGs have you over a barrel and there's nothing you can do!!
Someone posted a whizzed coin in a post in the near past, and many people commented on how nice it looked. In-hand with a magnifier, that would not be the case. If you sell coins to people who don't know, you can get away with lots, just check e-bay.
That is true however I don't think anyone or at least a dedicated Numismatist is trying to pull anything unethical over on anyone. It is or was just a conversation about If you liked cleaned coins. I was just saying that if you do it correctly there should be no problem and that you should do as Q. David Bowers has suggested,practice,practice,practice until you can do it with the right results 90% of the time.
That appears to be true with "smoothed" coins as well, they appear nicely in photos. (at least to me) Having never seen one in hand, I am only guess they look bad up close. smoothed examples of course the best example of this is one of the coins Gbroke had labeled smoothed, but I think he will say it looks good in the pictures AND in hand.
If NCS or PCGS tries to conserve a coin and after they have finished they can see that the dirt and grime or the ugly toning that they removed has made it possible to see that the coin had previously been harshly cleaned or had altered surfaces - then they will absolutely put that coin in a Genuine or Details slab. It happens every day. It doesn't matter who does the cleaning, if the cleaning is done properly then there will be no damage to the coin. And if there is no damage to the coin then the TPGs will slab it. That happens every day too. But if there is damage to the coin from that cleaning, then the cleaning will be deemed harsh and they will not slab it. That's it, plain and simple. The problem is way too many people don't recognize the signs of harsh cleaning when it is right in front of their eyes. That is especially true of many who do attempt to clean coins when they don't know what they are doing. So they do it incorrectly or improperly and they leave been behind traces that show that the coin has been harshly cleaned. And the TPGs can easily see that because they do know how to recognize one when they see it. But, if a coin is cleaned properly or correctly, no matter who does it, then there will be no traces of a harsh cleaning because there will be nothing to see.