Sorry, meant to say if the nickel was an error or just messed up and will post in just a min Sent from my VS870 4G using Tapatalk now Free
OK, then. Your nickel is just badly beaten up. It's a spender. I can't offer an opinion on your cent.
Both coins are damaged. There are a million potential ways for a coin to be damaged so I can't be sure what happened to each coin other than the damage was post-mint.
Oh, well then! I guess I've been proven wrong. Now I'm sure it's one of the great mint errors and worth probably one billion dollars.
Why do I have 2 then? Lol 1 was found by my fiance and one by me in the trunk of my car Sent from my VS870 4G using Tapatalk now Free
an how long has it been in your trunk getting bumped around an having stuff thrown an fall on it? face it, heavily damaged.
About a week with nothing else back there lol and still doesn't explain there being 2 with almost identical markings, both of which have d's stamped on the dents and the 97 has quarter like ridges... lol Sent from my VS870 4G using Tapatalk now Free
How many recks has that car been in before or after you bought it ? those coins are beat up about as bad as I am.
Because they were both damaged in similar fashions...there is no event in the minting process that could fit the appearance of your coin...therefore it is not something that happened during the minting process, and is therefore not an error.
Lol maybe but Idk what the odds of me ending up with 2 of them are, and 15 years apart haha Sent from my VS870 4G using Tapatalk