Possible New DDO For 1950-D Lincoln Cent

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Rick Stachowski, Oct 11, 2013.

  1. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Last edited: Oct 11, 2013
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    I see no evidence of doubling. There is 0% chance of this being 001 as well because the mintmark position is not the same.
     
  4. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    thanks for stopping by non cent, I know it isn't DDO-001, but it has some of the same errors as DDO-001, thats why I was thinking maybe something new, not to many for this year (DDOs)
     
  5. josh's coins

    josh's coins Well-Known Member

    it looks to me like it is probably an early make of the coin that year. Those coins will be better enhanced than the ones that come out ater in the year. sorta how engravings are worth more if they are the first set it has more detail. This is also why early releases the us mint issues are worth a little more money.
     
  6. josh's coins

    josh's coins Well-Known Member

    I would Edited...buy/sell/trade offers only in the advertising forums for such. I think this is not the first time you have mentioned services in the other areas of the forum. No more . Thxs.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 12, 2013
  7. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Perhaps I don't understand, but why is this coin of certification interest? Were you planning on sending it to a TPG? It looks like a normal, low to mid grade MS from the pictures, though there are no full-coin shots.

    The die scratches beneath Lincoln's head and the presence of flow lines towards the rim on the reverse also indicate that this probably isn't an early die state strike...
     
  8. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Edited for the sake of keeping the thread on course.
     
  9. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Lets end this portion of the thread at this point, it doesn't belong in this area for a couple of rule violations.
     
    non_cents likes this.
  10. josh's coins

    josh's coins Well-Known Member

    No, I have not. I was only telling him to think about getting the coin certified. Would there not be a problem if I told him to go to pcgs or ngc? just because my coin company grades coins makes it a violation?
     
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Not true. You specifically mentioned your 'grading company' and examples of the services you could provide. No, there would not be a problem if you had mentioned PCGS or NGC as those companies do not belong to you . Mentioning ones own service, outside of the advertising forums is self-promotion and not allowed in the other forum areas. If the owner of PCGS came to this forum and made the same comment , he would have received the same treatment.
     
    non_cents likes this.
  12. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Lets stay on track everybody, I have more wheats I want to post, I can take some portraits photos of this coin, and its like non cents said, in middle low ms-condition, red, maybe 64, but heres a photo of the only reason for that grade, I'm also going to show the original (not cropped) photo of UNUM A035 - 20131007_080000 (3).jpg A039 - 20131007_081535 (3).jpg
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2013
  13. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Heres some portraits A070 - 20131012_070942 (2).jpg A072 - 20131012_071134 (2).jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page