Please explain what "First Strike" means

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Westtexasbound, Sep 16, 2013.

  1. mush195

    mush195 Member

    Don't despair, I despise all the other special labels just as much as first strike.

    It's worth keeping in mind that collectors aren't the TPGs' customers, dealers are. I can't blame the TPGs too much for marketing the products their customers want, but I wish they'd keep in mind that their mission should also involve acting in the best interests of collectors. If they fail to do that, they might find the well has been poisoned. This is part of why I am such a big supporter of CAC...
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. wlwhittier

    wlwhittier Peripheral Member

    I never get near anything in slabs (though that may change about Morgan dollars).

    My collection is chaotic, eclectic and erratic...and increasingly in AirTites.

    But this thread has been an interesting revelation; I'm grateful to be able to 'listen' to this kind of give and take.

    Thanks, all of you!
     
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    I have a hard time agreeing that the 70 grade was ever theoretical since the 70 grade existed long before the TPGs ever came along. Even when the ANA published their first edition of their grading standards in 1977 the 70 grade not only existed, it was 1 of only 3 MS grades that existed - MS60, MS65, and MS70. And with every subsequent edition of the ANA grading standards, and both of the PCGS grading books, the 70 grade existed. There was nothing theoretical about it.
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    I have no problem agreeing with you that dealers submit more coins than than collectors do. But collectors are responsible for submitting millions of coins. They are customers of the TPGs too.

    As for what their mission should be, how do you define what the best interests of collectors should be ? Based on documented evidence consisting of millions of posts made by collectors on all of the various coin forums over the years, the collectors themselves think their best interests lie in giving them what they want. So in their minds the TPGs are acting in their best interests.

    As for CAC, do you really see them as being any different ? Do you think their reason for existing is to help collectors or do what is good for collectors ? Keep in mind that the founder of CAC is the same man who helped found both NGC and PCGS.

    No, CAC is a business just like the TPGs are a business, and CAC's sole purpose is for the company to make money.
     
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    How many pre-1965 slabs have a 70 grade Doug? How many slabs before they started slabbing moderns have ever achieved a 70? Someone listing a 70 value in a catalog for a 1893 S does not mean they ever thought one existed.

    I am well aware of Dr Sheldon's invention and its history and intended use. We are far, far from that point.
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    As I told you above, PCGS was grading moderns, post-'64 coins from the day they opened their doors for business in 1896. And yes, some of them albeit very few, were graded as 70's.

    But much more importantly, the ANA was grading coins as 70's in the late 1970's, a full 10 years before the TPGs even existed. And just about everybody else in the hobby graded coins as 70's back then too. They had to, for as I said above before 1987 there were only 3 MS grades that even existed - MS60, MS65, and MS70 - that's it. There was no such thing as an MS61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, or 69 until 1986 when the ANA and PCGS added those grades. So any coin that was nicer than an MS65 was graded as an MS70. And in those days even some older coins were given the 70 grade, quite a few in fact. So the 70 grade was most definitely not theoretical, it was in actual use. And not just in some catalog or price guide.

    One thing you seem to be forgetting Chris, in 1987 grading standards were significantly tightened up, a full 2 grades. The ANA tightened their standards and PCGS tightened their standards too. So it was not until 1987 that coins graded as a 70 began to be scarce.

    Now I'll readily grant you that in today's world we have come full circle and the 70 grade is again commonplace, much more so even than it ever was in the late 1970's and early 1980's.
     
  8. medoraman

    medoraman Supporter! Supporter

    I do appreciate your input Doug. I am sure I am just misremembering. I thought back in the 80's anything over a 65 was worthy of a press release it was so rare. I still recall CW articles on a MS66 large cent, and how everyone was praising how its such a rare, rare item to be judged as high as MS66.
     
  9. mush195

    mush195 Member

    The best interests of collectors should be what I say they are, obviously :)

    In all honesty, I do think the proliferation of special labels is bad for the hobby. While there are a lot of collectors who would probably disagree with that, eventually I think people will realize that paying extra money for a worthless piece of paper is a bad idea, and it's going to push collectors away from the hobby.

    There's always room for improvement. We should be working to make collecting more accessible. Particularly for higher value coins, we should strive to make it easier to identify the good coins, we should work toward more transparent pricing, and we should eliminate problem coins from the market. I think the TPGs have done and continue to do a lot to work toward these goals, but they could do better. Special labels, slabbing MS70 moderns, etc counteract this mission in my opinion. Those are marketing gimmicks that only serve the bottom lines of the TPGs and the dealers.

    I agree that CAC is profit driven, as any business should be. They also are obviously appealing to dealers, since CAC stickered coins may carry a premium. But I think they provide a useful service to collectors inasmuch as they help further the vision I outlined above.
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You're preaching to the choir on that one. I've been saying that for as long as they (special labels) have existed. But the public obviously disagrees with us.

    Yup, there always is room for improvement. And what you refer to as the best interest of collectors. Even 10-12 years ago I was writing articles proposing the adoption of a universal set of grading standards that everybody, all of the TPGs, dealers, and collectors alike, agreed to follow and use. And that those grading standards would be static, unchanging, over the years. That is the kind of thing that I believe would be in the best interest of collectors and the hobby in general.

    Unfortunately such a thing would not be a good business decision for the TPGs, so they are never going to do that. Nor does the public want such a thing for their own reasons. You see, they, collectors, like taking advantage of the gullible and uneducated just as much as the TPGs and some dealers do.

    As far as 70's go, I disagree with you on that one. I believe that there are great many coins out there that are worthy of the 70 grade. And if they are then they should be graded as such.

    The only problem with the 70 grade is that people refuse to believe what is right in front of their face, that coins graded 70 are as common as dirt and thus not deserving of the prices they pay for them. That problem is their own, not one forced upon them by anybody. The same thing goes for pricing in general. The dealers and TPGs don't set prices, the coin buying public does. They are the ones with the money ! What I am telling you is that people are their own worst enemies. 'Course they always have been, so it's not likely to change.
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    I have no doubt that you do recall such articles Chris. But you have to acknowledge that the MS66 grade didn't even exist until late 1986 when PCGS came along - which was when everything changed.

    It's the time frame you are not remembering correctly - not what happened, but when it happened.
     
  12. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    Quick definition: The first coin out of the hopper held in the fingers of some Mint official or Pol, usually in gloved hands, with their mug in Coin World.
     
  13. in5urgent

    in5urgent New Member

    Others have already replied to your question with essentially the same answer, but personally I always prefer an answer from an authoritative source on the subject.

    The following is from American Silver Eagles: A Guide to the U.S. Bullion Coin Program. (2012, Whitman Publishing LLC: Atlanta, GA). It was co-written by John M. Mercanti, former chief engraver of the U.S. Mint, and Michael Standish, the first full-time coin grader at PCGS and currently the firm’s senior grader and vice president of business development. I believe that Standish wrote the following excerpts. At the beginning of Chapter 3: Coin-by-Coin Study of American Silver Eagles (Kindle location 1007) he explains:

    A note about First Strikes: Since 2005, PCGS has designated American Silver Eagles packaged and delivered by the U.S. Mint in the first 30 days since the initial sales date as First Strike. If a particular American Silver Eagle goes on sale January 1, any coin packaged or delivered and submitted to PCGS for certification between January 1 and January 31 qualifies for this designation. PCGS verifies a coin was shipped from the Mint within the first 30 days either a) if the coin is shipped to PCGS from the customer with a postmarked date prior to the 30-day cutoff date; or b) if the customer does not open the sealed package that came from the Mint, and the PCGS confirms that it has an appropriate postmarked date.

    Later in the chapter, in the section about the 2006-W Proof (Kindle location 1663):

    Coin World associate editor Steve Roach used the 2006-W Proof as an example in an article about First Strike coins. “By virtue of population numbers alone, early release coins generally are not scarcer than their later-issued brethren,” he noted. “Take for example the Proof 2006-W American Eagle silver dollar. As of mid-June, PCGS graded 7,285 examples under its normal program and 7,716 pieces under its First Strike program. The early release programs take into account only when a coin was shipped from the U.S. Mint, not when it was minted. The programs were first developed by the grading services in 2005. The ‘First Strikes’ are visually imperceptible from their later-released counterparts” [Coin World, “First Strikes, Early Releases: Buyers Should Do Homework,” August 1, 2011]

    I think that the first excerpt pretty much sums up what “First Strike” is, and the fact that PCGS’ Standish would voluntarily quote Roach’s article explaining the worthlessness of it for collectors should be pretty illustrative.
     
  14. Chiefbullsit

    Chiefbullsit CRAZY HORSE

    On selling Reverse Proof Buffalos, would you rather have the money for:
    1. Reverse Proof Buffalo FS
    2. Reverse Proof Buffalo No FS
     
  15. 9roswell

    9roswell Senior Member

    they are only worth what someone will pay for it and i for one would never buy one that had FS in the first place. i would rather have the $400,000,000 for the powerball!
     
  16. Chiefbullsit

    Chiefbullsit CRAZY HORSE

    You didn't answer the question.
     
  17. sodude

    sodude Well-Known Member

    So would you take an inferior coin rather than one in a First Strike slab?
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Which would you rather be ?
    1 - well educated regarding coins and the numismatic hobby so that you knew what was really going on and whether or not somebody was trying to take advantage of you ?

    2 - blissfully ignorant and uneducated about the hobby so that others could take advantage of you any time they wanted ?
     
  19. d.t.menace

    d.t.menace Member

    It sounds like you still are under the impression that a first strike coin is always superior
    to a non first strike coin?
    Son, put down the coolaide, back away from the table and go back and reread the first page in this thread. Pay particular attention to posts #2, 4, 8 and 18.
     
  20. Chiefbullsit

    Chiefbullsit CRAZY HORSE

    Doug, I ask my question first and you haven't answered it either.
     
  21. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Please explain what "First Strike" means?

    Easy: A BS marketing ploy.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page