Keep this in mind when grading small coins.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Insider, Jan 15, 2023.

  1. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    I tell my seminar students that smaller coins are usually harder to grade than larger coins because they are harder to see. Additionally, they are lighter so generally they will not be as severely banged up.

    While reading a sample copy of The Rosen Numismatic Advisory, I spotted one other thing I do that you should also remember to apply when grading smaller coins. During an interview of John Albanese by Maurice Rosen he said: "Gold Commems are small coins, so a mark, nick, or hairline might be quite tiny. But, I view that mark as if it were in proportion to a larger coin, say a $10 or $20 Liberty, and think how would I judge it? That same flaw might jump out at you on a larger coin."

    You should learn to think like a pro :cigar: to grade like one. ;)
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Do you think, given the context of the foregoing, the end of the quote should read differently, " . . . jump out at you on a smaller coin"?
     
  4. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    In the eye of the beholder, I am the pro of choice. Good luck.
     
  5. masterswimmer

    masterswimmer A Caretaker, can't take it with me

    Mike, I think he got it right.

    On a smaller coin that mark, nick or hairline might seem tiny and innocuous. On a larger coin, that same mark, nick or hairline, proportionately sized, might jump out at you. If it were the same size mark, nick or hairline, going from the smaller coin to the larger coin it could possibly 'disappear'.
     
    Insider and Mr.Q like this.
  6. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I get it now . . . slow on the uptake, am I.

    Multiplying the size of the mark by the ratio of large coin to small coin, and not holding the size of the mark constant must be what he meant.
     
    masterswimmer likes this.
  7. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    I believe I read that interview, it was just as CAC was starting up. Very informative.
     
  8. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    What's interesting is....that John Albanese has a reputation as being very tough on gold, that being Saint-Gaudens DEs. Which are a big coin with large, visible, fields (maybe it applies to Liberty DEs too, not sure).

    So...should he be more forgiving when evaluationg Double Eagles given their larger size....and also considering gold is a "soft" metal...as opposed to smaller and harder nickels and dimes ?
     
  9. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    You should learn to think like a pro :cigar: to grade like one. ;)

    I think a good lesson for many of the TPG's as well:D...
     
  10. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    No.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  11. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    I think most are more forgiving of large gold coins. They are larger and easier to see any marks. They are heavy and do more damage when they hit another coin of soft gold.
     
    Jack D. Young and GoldFinger1969 like this.
  12. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    You think that led to the period(s) of leniency in grading large gold coins like Saints ?
     
  13. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    It’s been a bromide since I was collecting larger coins can get away with more hits.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page