1681 Charles II 6d (high grade, errosion)

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by JeromeLS, Aug 4, 2012.

  1. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    I'm finding it difficult to calculate this coin's value, because it's got some erosion (from water?) on the obverse and haymarking on the reverse. The reverse is high grade. I'd conservatively grade it about extremely fine, considering the weak strikes common in this series.

    My catalogue (four years out of date), give F as £50, VF £225 and EF £650. My personal feeling is that it's going to be somewhere between the F and VF price, but I'm unsure. I'd like some second opinions. It's attractive despite the damage.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It doesn't have erosion, the coin is corroded. It looks like it was probably found buried in the ground. It also looks to have been harshly cleaned. Bottom line, the coin is damaged and ungradeable.

    As to value, I would estimate it to be worth about 10%-15% of what a problem free VF example is worth.
     
  4. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    It's not harshly cleaned as far as I can tell, there are no hairline scratches visible under a 10x loup. The undamaged surface has a light grey tone, and it doesn't look unnaturally bright in hand (the scan is bad, I'll upload a high definition photograph soon). It was found buried in a river bed.

    I don't really collect modern coins at all, so no surprises that my prediction of the value was so off.
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Look at the 6 o'clock position where the 4th shield is supposed to be. The coin has scraped so hard in that area (probably in an effort to clean the coin) that the shield was completely removed.
     
  6. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    It's obvious from both sides of the coin that the flan was heavily filed before striking. If you look at the Scottish shield, the file marks are actually under it.
     
  7. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    Here are some better photographs.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    So so metallurgy plays a bit of a part in the condition of the coin on the obverse. But this coin has been harshly cleaned at sometime in the more recent past. Contemporary coins from Britain are frequently found with the sort of corrosion that exists on the front of the piece. I do see traces of what was at one time a decent amount of encrustation though - particularly on the lowest crown on the reverse where the legend "ET HIB" is. The damage on the lower English shield looks more post mint than mint damage. The outline of the Scottish shield displays scratches where they would have been struck through or worn off with a bit of circulation.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Sorry, those are not adjustment marks (file marks). That's post strike damage.
     
  10. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    They look MUCH lighter in hand. It's probably a combination of file marks, corrosion and cleaning.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page