1926 Peace Dollar - cleaned or not?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by Prime Mover, Jul 29, 2012.

  1. Prime Mover

    Prime Mover Active Member

    Ok, I took the coin outside in the daylight, and was able to get shots of it in the holder, as well as removed (carefully) from the holder. I think these are nice shots of the coin, with the light luster, hopefully it helps.

    In holder:
    1926_peace_front_holder.jpg 1926_peace_reverse_holder.jpg

    Out of holder:

    1926_peace_front_no_holder.jpg 1926_peace_reverse_no_holder.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    May I ask how you came to this conclusion?



    Even if done "properly", dipping absolutely can have a negative impact depending on how you look at it. Just because the TPGs will often reward higher grades to such coins, this does not make it right. As far as I am concerned, literally thousands of mid 19th century coins have been ruined all in the name of getting a few ticks higher grade (think pre-civil war gold), which is a negative IMO.



    "Technical gem"?? May I ask how you define "technical gem"?



    The coin does not display original surfaces, nor is it anywhere even close to 65. To be honest, the coin has been rather harshly cleaned and would not grade. That said, if you like and will enjoy owning, this is all that really matters.
     
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I would say it is most definitely not a 65. In fact, with the big gouge in the eagle's head I'm not sure a TPG would even grade it at all. And it looks like it may have suffered the effects of light corrosion on the reverse between 1 and 3 o'clock.
     
  5. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    The coin has been cleaned, and harshly I might add. Signs of hairlines on both sides is suggestive of that.

    As far as grade, I can also see signs of wear, and enough of it to keep it out of the MS range IMO.

    The seller graded it 65? I hope you didn't lay out anywhere near 65 money for it because it's an AU at best, and with the harsh cleaning, it may receive a DETAILS label.
     
  6. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Sorry for any directness, I didn't know you were so touchy.
     
  7. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Ah, the benefit of daylight pictures. What a difference that makes.
     
  8. Prime Mover

    Prime Mover Active Member

    I didn't lay out a dime, however my mom got rooked, big time. She paid $145 for it, in 1992.

    There were a few of these type coins, morgans and peace dollars from this same company that seem to be in the very same boat, although luckily the receipts for those show a lot less overpayment (though still egregious for that time), more along the lines of what it would be worth melt value today.

    She was big on all the "collectibles" stuff, from everywhere (Hummels/Geobels, beanie babies, etc) . Were she around today she'd probably be a very big buyer from the likes of the Coin Vault, et al.
     
  9. Prime Mover

    Prime Mover Active Member

    I picked a bad week to stop sniffing glue...

    Directness I don't mind, but I thought that bordered along a personal jab. I've had a bad couple of weeks, so I may be a little over sensitive. Sorry for sniping back.
     
  10. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    LOL! But hey, good answer, we're good. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page