Proof VS Uncirculated.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Detecto92, May 22, 2012.

  1. Detecto92

    Detecto92 Well-Known Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Is there a question? For moderns like this a really nice DCAM is my favorite, but really lusters MS graded coins are sweet also. Some of the older proofs don't do anything for me.
     
  4. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    I agree, one is a proof, and one is a business strike.
     
  5. Detecto92

    Detecto92 Well-Known Member

    Lol, I knew that.

    I don't like older proofs, in certain settings. Proof franklin halves, IMO, are ugly. It looks like someone polished the bejesus out of a normal coin.

    Proof wheats and Lincolns, I don't like as well.

    Now a indian cent, in proof, especially when toned, looks very attractive.
     
  6. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Agreed about Franklin proofs, or other types for that matter. Unless they are cameo, they do just look, umm, how do I say it, "too shiny"?

    Franklins ugly mug isn't helping the cause either.
     
  7. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    That was the problem with brilliant proofs. The first coins from the die would have some cameo, how much varied, but the cameo faded and you had bland brilliant proofs. Also back then they would often repolish the dies as they became worn so you could have late state proof dies as well, ugh.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page