My objective has no collection!

Well, I do understand the deep and rich meaning of a 1968 no mint mark dime, something that until now at least, has still escaped you.


Amanda

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Actually, it hasn't now, nor did it ever, escape me. I know, and did know, you were referring to the 1968 Roosevelt Proof, no S mint mark error, of which, no one knows with any degree of certainty how many of these made it out of the Mint in San Francisco that year, and are included in the total number of 3,041,506 proof dimes struck in San Fran that year.

 

Because it has deep historical significance and... BTW - do you own a cellphone with a camera?

 

Its getting close.

 

That is SOOO true

 

This thread is getting carried away.

Do this as an experiment. Get a nice MS ASE and putting it in the laundry about 5 times. Run down the the 7-11 and try to spend it. See if that works?

Ruben

 

Camera's are a standard feature on cellphones, so yes I do.

 

So, did you take a picutre of your no mint dime and the soda girl?

ruben

 

My cellphone has a camera; however, it's a feature I never use.

For coins, I use a Kodak Easyshare, 9.5 MPs. I also have a Canon EOS Rebel T3i DSLR 18.0 Mps with 3 lenses.

 

Some confusion appears to have arisen from the fact that some members are slightly serious in their postings, and others insist on instilling their weird (and, alas, unwelcome) sense of humor into the threads.

 

that is not funny

 

And which do you use for a 1968 no mint mark dime?

 

Hello

Not really. The confusion was in understanding the term "duh'. Its been clarified now.

Amanda

 

(Yawn)

 

It didn't start out that way. It started out with spending a golder double eagle at the seven-eleven.

I'm not responsible for what happened later.

 

Your threads annoy me endlessly. But I make the best of it, dive in, and try to have fun. So you should take it as a compliment. :yes:

 

You guys crack me up........

 

Are we now adrift in sewage creek with no means of foward
locomotion?

 

It looks more like a planchet error.

 

We can ask the banking culprits.

Amanda