Opinions on this 1826 Bust Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by rev1774, Jan 1, 2012.

  1. rev1774

    rev1774 Well-Known Member

    Would love some opinions, condition, variety and is 120.00 fair or not.

    1826Both.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    I think it'd grade original. Maybe VF35... Don't think it's quite XF. Cheek looks pretty good, and the wing feathers are fairly bold, but the bust's cap and upper-hair details have a bit too much wear to justify an XF grade. I'd love to attribute it, but alas, my Overton book has been misplaced :eek:.

    Hopefully I find it soon... That book was expensive!

    -Brian
     
  4. McBlzr

    McBlzr Sr Professional Collector

    I think the OBV looks VF & the REV looks XF because "E Pluribus" is strong & not showing wear as a lot of Bust Halves I have viewed.
    120 sounds like a good price to me.
     
  5. After a little while studying, I believe it is a O.112 or O.112a. I'm not completely sure. Also looks like its in a NGC holder :D
     
  6. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Looks like it could be O.104a which Overton classifies as R-3 201-500 known. As far as price I couldn't tell ya.
     
  7. VACookey

    VACookey New Member

    I keep seeing references to O.112 or something like that when talking about capped bust halves. I have no clue what that means. Can you point me in the direction of some information so that I can understand it? Thanks!
     
  8. VACookey

    VACookey New Member

    Ok cool. Thanks!
     
  9. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    I haven't evaluated it too closely, but at first glance it looks genuine, around VF35, nice strike (clear EPU), old cleaning...I like it.
     
  10. rev1774

    rev1774 Well-Known Member

    I think it looks good for the price as well. Recently, I have just been seeking some added views and opinions from others so I can see if I am picking anything up as far as knowledge.

    Hopefully, will hear from some others as well as I think this might be one for my type set.
    As for variety, if it would be an R3, does that one carry any type of premium if attributed on the holder?

    Thanks
     
  11. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    O.104a, VF25. Looks problem free. Not crazy about the mottled look. But you could do a lot worse. $120 seems fair.
    Lance.
     
  12. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

  13. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    Wow. Good job, Lance... Hit the nail on the head! :thumb:
     
  14. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

    Nice half for the price rev. I agree that obverse is VF+ reverse = XF. I respect Brians knowledge, but he does tend to grade low. The only reason I would go VF obverse is the lack of relief in "Liberty," and the small gouge to the left of the eyeball.
     
  15. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

    Wow.. VF25? The reverse screams XF-40. Quick where is the hammer?
     
  16. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    That's because grading high costs more $$$. :p

    And the funny part is, I overgraded this coin (VF35)... If you checked the link I included in my 2nd to last post, the coin is an NGC VF25.

    -Brian
     
  17. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    CBH's are tough to grade, JCB. I collect this series in VF, and I still have trouble telling some VF20's from XF40's! :foot-mouth:

    -Brian
     
  18. rev1774

    rev1774 Well-Known Member

    I submitted an offer so we shall see..
     
  19. JCB1983

    JCB1983 Learning

    I absolutely love CHB VF-XF. The old grey look, just looks so natural and each bust has its own characteristics.
     
  20. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    A better reverse rarely adds a grade, though it can reduce one. I'd give this one a 35.

    I figured the obverse was low-mid VF. When Liberty's hair blends smoothly with her cap I usually figure 25, tops.

    I'm neutral as far as eye appeal is concerned. I like the crust but I think it has toned over after an old dip in a less than ideal way.
    Lance.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page