1916 standing Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by njpmoose15, Jul 22, 2011.

  1. njpmoose15

    njpmoose15 Member

    Can you give me your opinion on if it is real? Please!! slq1.jpg slq3.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. njpmoose15

    njpmoose15 Member

  4. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Warning, Will Robinson! WARNING!
     
  5. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    It appears to show at least XF details, which would make it a five-figure coin, but it's in a stapled paper flip marked "VG-F".

    Nope, I can't see any reason for concern. :rolleyes:
     
  6. McBlzr

    McBlzr Sr Professional Collector

    Does not look right to me! The exposed left breast should have better details ?
     
  7. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    Exactly. Chances are extremely high it is fake. A genuine one would be in a respectable TPG holder and worth perhaps $10,000.
    Lance.
     
  8. swhuck

    swhuck Junior Member

    Not making any judgments yet, but I wouldn't touch this coin without better pictures of the obverse,
     
  9. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I can't tell much from the photos...but the surface looks porous, which is a bad sign.
     
  10. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    According to the figures I have access to, only 1 out of every 200 examples of this date are in holders, and that includes re-submitted examples. Of course, I wouldn't recommend buying an uncertified piece unless you did so in person with a well known and respected dealer. The piece above looks a bit off to me.
    Guy
     
  11. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Is this based on a comparison of slabbed pop counts to original mintage figures?

    I don't know how many were stashed by contemporary collectors, but given that "dateless" ones are still turning up with some frequency, I imagine quite a lot of them were circulated into oblivion. There are probably more hitting the melting pots every day. :( (They're easily distinguished from other years, even when heavily worn, but there are an awful lot of people throwing coins into buckets without checking at that level of detail...)
     
  12. ML94539

    ML94539 Senior Member

    current ngc population is about 550, pcgs is 1100, not sure how many are resubmissions.
     
  13. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    I would bet that this is a genuine coin... with an altered date... the 6 looks different then the rest of the numbers. A clear close-up of the date area will help.
     
  14. SirCharlie

    SirCharlie Chuck

    I would agree 100%. It's hard to make out the six clearly, but it seems to continue in the upward direction, and on this coin it should continue to curve to the right. A closer pic would be nice.
     
  15. coop

    coop Senior Member

    The reverse is correct for the 1916 & 1917 type 1. So it can't be altered from a different year.
    [​IMG]
     
  16. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    It's probably a 17 type I that was altered.
     
  17. jloring

    jloring Senior Citizen

    Either way, the coin is NOT genuine. The "6" should be exactly the same as the "9" (rotated 180 degrees).
     
  18. RaceBannon

    RaceBannon Member

    The 1916 SLQ is precisely the type of coin you should only buy slabbed/certified by a major TPG.
     
  19. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    Definitely an altered 1917 , if you enlarge the pics , the hair comes to two distinct points on the 1917 , on the 1916 it comes to one . Also the shield on the shield is short and squat on the 16 , on the '17 it's longer and narrower .
     
  20. coop

    coop Senior Member

  21. davidh

    davidh soloist gnomic

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page