1911 D $2.5 Indian Test

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by LostDutchman, Jul 14, 2011.

  1. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    They just posted the grade and it MS63'ed. WOWZER!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SirCharlie

    SirCharlie Chuck

    That's great! Very nice coin!
    Congrats!
     
  4. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    i think it's a beautiful coin !! congratulations!
     
  5. ikandiggit

    ikandiggit Currency Error Collector

    Awesome!
     
  6. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Man, I am so glad that coin didn't walk through the door of the local Cash4Gold instead...
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I should be surprised at the grade but I'm not. Gettin used to it I guess.

    I'm glad for ya Matt, that's a biggie !
     
  8. McBlzr

    McBlzr Sr Professional Collector

    [​IMG]


    That is great for THE KEY DATE in $ 2.5 Indian head series :hail::thumb::hail:
     
  9. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    Congratulations, like I said, it could grade 63! Bid is over $17.5K! Incuse gold is tough to grade. In this case the luster carried it. The owner will be thrilled and you have earned his full trust.
     
  10. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    Phenomenal! That's great news!
    Lance.
     
  11. SirCharlie

    SirCharlie Chuck

    Very wise decision to have it graded! The value likely tripled. The grading of Pratt's gold coins vary so very much. If your customer was a gambler, I think it would be very interesting to have a different person submit it again to see if it came back the same, or does NGC now have coin identification software so they can spot it as a regrade....maybe PCGS even? If it were to lose a number to a 62, you lose $$$$, but if it gains a number to a 64, your value pops way up there. That's a big difference on a coin that is so subjective in grading. At times like this, it would be nice to have an explanation from the grader as to why he/she awarded it the grade that he/she did.
     
  12. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

  13. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    This coin is not an upgrade candidate. I think they graded it accurately.

    Now comes the part where I get a little poorer...
     
  14. SirCharlie

    SirCharlie Chuck

    That's right, you were going to buy it from him. Good luck.
    Perhaps he will give you a break since you did so much for him.
     
  15. SirCharlie

    SirCharlie Chuck

    Thanks for the interesting thread. Would you care to share the outcome?
    Is it destined to be a part of your collection?
    Chuck

     
  16. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    Here is the coin in the holder.
    11d1.jpg 11d2.jpg
     
  17. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    :thumb:Nice one Dutch!
    hard one to get a MS-63 only thing better would be MS-65+!

    :kewl:
     
  18. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Poorer? That depends on you definitions.

    Congratulations and good luck!
     
  19. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    I wasn't aware that the auction and population figure information was copyrighted. Presumably CW Trends is not...
     
  20. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Anything and everything you see on the net is automatically copyrighted including this and every other post in this forum. However, some of it we have been given permission to use. Heritage picture come to mind (so long as they are credited).
     
  21. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    So it would be OK to cite pop. or auction figures as long as the wonderful, wonderful people who provide that info. are given credit?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page