1958P Franklin Half Type 2 Proof Reverse- Business Strike Coin.

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Chuckster 125, Jan 18, 2011.

  1. Chuckster 125

    Chuckster 125 Senior Member

    I found this beautiful 58P Franklin, Type 2 roll searching halfs.

    How scarce is the 58P in comparison to the more known 56?

    This coin is in real nice shape- Mint State grade (IMHO)

    Is this a full bell lines coin also?

    What kind of premium value might this coin carry given its rarity and condition?

    Thanks for any info/help!

    Chuck.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    On the business strikes, after '56, it is the type 1 that is the scarce coin.
     
  4. Chuckster 125

    Chuckster 125 Senior Member


    All due respect, but that's not correct.

    The type 1 business strike is the normal reverse for all 1957 to 1963 Franklin Business strikes and is not scarce.

    The Type 2 Proof Reverse is the scarce coin as it was meant to be on proofs only, not on business strikes.

    Ref the below site.

    http://reviews.ebay.com/1956-Proof-...-Type-1-and-Type-2_W0QQugidZ10000000006277091
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    According to Breen, only about 30% of the business strikes have the type 1 reverse.
     
  6. chridular

    chridular Member

    This doesn't look FBL to me from the pic. I'm also seeing here "Breen estimated only 20% of the business strikes exhibit the type 2 reverse." (Tomaska, The Complete Guide to Franklin Half Dollars p. 92) So I hope that helps with those questions. As for premium on this coin... I wouldn't think much, but I can't be sure so I'd love to see what others think regarding monetary value.
     
  7. Chuck, here is a link to a thread that will explain it all:

    http://www.cointalk.com/t72184/

    This is probably one of the best threads I have ever seen at CT.

    Enjoy. :) TC
     
  8. chridular

    chridular Member

    TC. Thanks for posting the link. That is an excellent thread!
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

  10. chridular

    chridular Member

    So, we have more rarity of the type 2 reverse on 1958 business strikes and more rarity of the type 1 reverse on the 1959.
     
  11. Chuckster 125

    Chuckster 125 Senior Member


    Ref: Direct from Mr John Wexler's Website: Wrong Die Varieties section- 2011.

    "The circulation strike Franklin Half dollars from 1956 through 1963 can be found with both the Type 1 and the Type 2 reverse. The Type 2 is much scarcer than the Type 1, but that is not a surprise since they most likely originate from reused proof dies just like the Type B circulation strike Washington quarters for the same time period."


    The Type 2 is the scarcer coin, not the type 1.

    Thanks for all the info/help!

    Chuck.
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I don't know edited Doug is smoking, but the Type 2 is the scarce variety on the Business strikes. It is only known on 1958 and 1959 Philadelphia mint Franklins, although a member here has reported a 1957 example (I have not personally seen it).

    On the Proof coins of 1956, the Type 1 is the scarce variety.

    Heritage has this one very wrong, and we all know how credible Breen is.

    As for the OP's coin, that appears to be a circulated AU Type 2, and attractive for what it is.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    OK, I'll tell ya - Marlboro ;)

    And as you should know by now, I have never, ever, had any interest in varieties of any kind. And I don't pretend to know anything about varieties, never have. But when somebody ask a question about a subject that I can recall reading about, I am happy to supply whatever information I have run across. Isn't that how you share knowledge ? But the information is not mine nor is it my opinion on the subject. I merely report what there is to share.

    Maybe. But then again maybe they are right. Maybe they know something you don't ?

    Well, we know he certainly made some mistakes in his books, but he was right about a whole lot more things than he was wrong about. And can you name even a single person who hasn't made some mistakes in their books ?

    The issue is this - it is not at all uncommon for there to be differing opinions among experts. Especially when it comes to varieties. This expert says this and another says that - and they are exact opposites. So what does a wise person do when they run across differing opinions on something like that ?

    Now I don't know about you but when something like does catch my interest I try to find out for myself. I do a bit of looking into things to see just what is what. I try to find out what history says by looking at stuff like past auctions and pop reports. That can sometimes provide you with information to see which expert is most likely correct. Maybe not definitively correct, but most likely correct.

    Interestingly enough the pop reports from realized auctions, when comparing apples to apples, say that the '59 type one and type two are about equal in numbers in the 65 FBL and 66 FBL grades.

    There weren't enough auctions to check 65 non FBL type one and two or 66 non FBL type one and two, but you can look for yourself if you want - MS type one search - MS type two search

    Then I look at prices to see what variety typically sells for more money because as a general rule the more scarce variety will bring the higher prices. In that regard it seems that the type one would be the scarce variety because it brings the higher prices more times than not.

    Type One realized auctions -

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=350&Lot_No=546

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=394&Lot_No=4220

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=1136&Lot_No=2761


    Type Two realized auctions -

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=359&Lot_No=1391

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=394&Lot_No=4221

    http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=400&Lot_No=1571

    Now you can make whatever you want of the information. It's not my information nor is it my opinion. I am merely presenting what is there to see. You can decide for yourself what the answer is.
     
  14. Chuckster 125

    Chuckster 125 Senior Member



    Well, it looks like we can agree to dis-agree.

    You posted 1959 Franklins- my coin is a 1958.

    Regardless of the year, I'll stay with what Mr. Wexler stated.

    Thanks again for all the info/help etc.

    Chuck.
     
  15. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Doug, I see no consistency in those records. They prove nothing.
     
  16. proofartoncircs

    proofartoncircs Junior Member

    Bill Edwards went through a lot of Franklin half dollars and estimated 20% of the 1958's were type II. He estimated 35 % of the 1959's were type II and 1 1/2 % were from a class III doubled die. I have found many 1959 type II's in dealer's stock, but these were from cut up 1959 mint sets.
     
  17. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    I though the type II's were the rare too but that one looks like a type I to me? What am I missing?
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I didn't claim they proved anything, matter of fact I speciffically said that they did not. But they do at least provide some evidence that Breen might be right. By the same token quoting from books by Tomaska and Wexler doesn't prove anything either.

    The point is there is a difference of opinion among the experts, which is not unusual. And as I said, when there is then we as collectors have to do our own research and thinking to see who is more likely to be right.
     
  19. proofartoncircs

    proofartoncircs Junior Member

    Here is the only description I have of how Bill Edwards did his research. He with 4 others including James Johnson of Coin World started researching these varieties in 1966.

    I believe his numbers are pretty good for the initial distribution as minted. 1959's distribution of varieties could easily be distorted now. Many have been melted. Dealers cut up mint sets might have had a better chance of survivng. I could believe 1959 I's are scarcer now, especially in dealer's stock.

    Certainly a similiar condition exists with the the 1970 D quarter.
    11.2% of circulation finds are type M (RDV-007). This is the proof artwork reverse created for the clads in 1968 but only used for proofs in part of that year. It was used for the vast majority of 1970 D's in mint sets. It now seems to be the vast majority in dealer's stock.

    Incidently the II/I class III doubled die is interesting in that it was a deliberate use of a doubled die by the mint. The die was heavily buffed before first use to hide signs of doubling.

     
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I'll take the noted Franklin experts over Breen any day.
     
  21. vnickels

    vnickels Matt Draiss Numismatics & Galleries

    Reminds me of the variety on quarters used with Proof dies on business strikes.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page