I'm very new to this so not very knowledgeable --- yet. I've tried to do a lot of homework but honestly, I can see two pictures one that has an error and one that doesn't, and they often look the same to me. Figured the next step was to ask others. For this coin, I thought the area to the right of TRUST looked strange - almost like lettering. Also the rim seemed thinner at the top with the letters closer to it. So I thought maybe the letters got mushed a bit to begin with and then with more wear on top of that.
I hate to state the obvious. Do you have a Redbook, yet? Get the mega deluxe one, for your first one. It has a series of photos for each coin to show different states of wear. It's really helpful to have that to refer to, especially if you're sorting coins by type. I find it easier than searching through the online resources, especially when looking at lots of coins. It will also have photos of the different, most notable/known errors. If you get deep into varieties, you'll have to seek out better sources but, a good Redbook will help you answer simple questions like the one you posted here.
This won't happen during the minting process so it can't be an error. It was hit/tumbled after it left the mint and is post mint damage (pmd). The 95% Copper alloy is a soft metal and what you're seeing is deformation Hope this helps
Just a suggestion.. There is a Error Coins forum here on CoinTalk. First find out what you may have and worry about a premium last. Welcome to CoinTalk.
I don’t know of any way that could have happened at the mint so I have to say it’s from wear and tear, possibly damaged and then the wear or the coin. Welcome to CT.
Welcome to CT @coingambler66. You did the right thing and that is why this forum exists. Before 1982, when the mint went to zinc coated in copper, the cent was mostly copper and the metal was very easily moved around, so hits and everyday circulation would distort the features. I believe your cent is the simple results of many years of circulation. Good hunting and collecting.