What did PCGS grade this 1921 Standing Liberty Quarter??

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by LostDutchman, May 30, 2009.

  1. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    Anyone want to hazard a guess? You might be surprised

    This picture is what it looks like in hand %100. The coin has some luster present.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Well since you put in that way, my guess is that the incredibly weak strike along with the ugly patina which is completely muting the luster is making this MS61 look like an AU coin.
     
  4. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I suspect Lehigh is correct, but I'll go a bit more conservative in my guess -- AU 55.
     
  5. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    LOL - the first two are probably correct, but I am going to say AU50 because of the banged up knees.
     
  6. raider34

    raider34 Active Member

    I was going to guess AU58, but since you said you might be surprised I'll say MS62, that's gotta' be one heck of a weak strike.
     
  7. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I just can't bring myself to go higher than xf-40.
     
  8. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    The scratch on the eagle's wing... is that on the holder or the coin?
     
  9. LostDutchman

    LostDutchman Under Staffed & Overly Motivated Supporter

    it is on the coin.
     
  10. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    That should be body bagged, bit overwise It's not better than an XF45 - and I wouldn't grade it even that.

    Ruben
     
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    It appears as Au-58, but probably market graded as MS-62.

    Jim
     
  12. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    I'm going to say AU58, that would surprise me...
    Some wear is present, so I don't know exactly how it could get a Mint State grade, if that is what you mean be you might be surprised...
    Can't wait to see the grade :)
     
  13. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Hi Ruben.

    I agree with desert gem and graded MS62. Almost similar situation to a previous post discussing an 1883 O Morgan with the surface condition. But once again, My crystal ball is a bit fuzzy these days . Underneath that surface , is probably some nice luster.
     
  14. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    I'm going to say AU55. It looks like the high points have a couple small rubs on them.

    Why should it be body bagged? I don't see any evidence of damage to the coin. I don't find the toning attractive...but I don't see anything that would make this coin upgradable.
     
  15. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    Even accounting for the ugliness, I can't see this coin as getting higher than an AU-58
     
  16. TomCorona

    TomCorona New Member

    My inexperienced opinion looks about EF-40.
     
  17. mgChevelle

    mgChevelle AMERICAN

    i was thinking xf-45, but maybe not
     
  18. kevinslack

    kevinslack silvereagle

  19. byrd740

    byrd740 Numismatist

    I am going to have to say XF-45.
     
  20. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    AU-50?, but that is one ugly AU.
     
  21. Joshycfl

    Joshycfl Senior Member

    AU55, I see nothing that would have it "bagged"
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page