CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > Coin Chat

Notices

Coin Chat Please use this section for discussion of numismatic topics that don't fit in other sections.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-20-2009, 07:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Toning Freak
 
Lehigh96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
A tough call on a 1964-D Jefferson Nickel on E-Bay

I won this Jefferson Nickel on E-Bay on Sunday night from a very reputable toned coin seller for $300. The population is 7/0 and the Numismedia Wholesale price is $650. The only problem is that PCGS uses different standards for grading Jefferson Nickels than NGC and is consistently one grade lower than NGC. The PCGS price guide in MS66 is $275. My dilemna is that you just can't readily find 1964-D toned Jeffersons in MS66 or MS67. I felt like if I passed on this coin, I might not have another chance to find a superbly toned example any time in the near future. I don't have the coin yet but here are the seller's pics of the obverse. What does everyone think?




Now this one will probably be for sale for a long time to come, but I don't like the black on the peripheries for that price.

http://cgi.ebay.com/MONSTER-TONED-1964-D-JEFFERSON-NICKEL-NGC-MS-67_W0QQitemZ120350937775QQihZ002QQcategoryZ41088QQ ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


Lehigh96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-20-2009, 08:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South, Florida
Posts: 121
The obverse is superbly toned. What does the reverse look like?
breakintheweb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 08:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Toning Freak
 
Lehigh96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Lehigh96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 09:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
U.S. Money Collector
 
Magman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,017
My Mood:
I think it's a great coin!

Im not sure what your dilemma is though, is it that you wont be able to switch it over to PCGS in the same grade?
Magman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 09:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Supporter**
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,356
As a fellow collector of toned Jeffersons, I think you did just fine.

1964 is a tough year to find nice toners. I don't know what it is. There must have been a minor alloy change; some trace element present or missing from what was there before.

With as many 1964 nickels as were minted, I've never seen one in person that was MS-67, let alone one as nicely toned as this.

Let's put it this way: I highly doubt you'll lose money on it.
borgovan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 09:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
50 Years and Still At It
 
kanga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,589
My Mood:
High grade Jeffs in 1964 are tough to find.
Looking at the mintage you would think there should be tons of them.
Nope.
The Mint went for quantity and kissed off quality.
All tied in with silver's demise.
__________________
ANA Member
APS Member
ARA Member

There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't.
kanga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 09:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Enthusiast
 
sketcherpbr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to sketcherpbr
Purty. I likes it.
__________________
Monetary values amount to nothing in the face of a coin that's survived centuries to make it into my hand.
sketcherpbr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 12:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Danr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,706
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by borgovan View Post
As a fellow collector of toned Jeffersons, I think you did just fine.

1964 is a tough year to find nice toners. I don't know what it is. There must have been a minor alloy change; some trace element present or missing from what was there before.

With as many 1964 nickels as were minted, I've never seen one in person that was MS-67, let alone one as nicely toned as this.

Let's put it this way: I highly doubt you'll lose money on it.
that's odd I thought it was a bit pricey.
Danr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 03:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
Toning Freak
 
Lehigh96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magman View Post
I think it's a great coin!

Im not sure what your dilemma is though, is it that you wont be able to switch it over to PCGS in the same grade?
I am just not thrilled about buying a top pop coin with a population of 7 sight unseen. The photo of the reverse is too small to make my own determination about the grade of the coin. If the coin is overgraded, I paid PCGS price guide for a coin in an NGC holder worth 1/10th the price.

The dilemna is the gamble. I know I won't find a superbly toned high grade 1964-D on the market anytime soon, but I don't know that I just bought an MS67 or an MS66 in an MS67 holder.
Lehigh96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 03:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
U.S. Money Collector
 
Magman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,017
My Mood:
ah gotcha.

I dunno, at least it's only a 300$ gamble, it could be worse.
Magman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 02:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
GDJMSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 23,513
Personally, I think the coin got the bump for the color. Too many hits to make 67, but they are well hidden by the toning. Hits on the forehead, nose, in the hair, right fields and legends. Few minor ones on the collar. Minor hits in the left field by the rim on the rev. Not what you wanna hear I know.

But when you get that coin, I'd really like to see a closeup of the portico on the rev. Something going on there but I'm not sure what.
__________________
knowledge ..... share it
GDJMSP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 08:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Danr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,706
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magman View Post
ah gotcha.

I dunno, at least it's only a 300$ gamble, it could be worse.
Buy it now US $1,050.00
Danr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 09:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
Toning Freak
 
Lehigh96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by GDJMSP View Post
Personally, I think the coin got the bump for the color. Too many hits to make 67, but they are well hidden by the toning. Hits on the forehead, nose, in the hair, right fields and legends. Few minor ones on the collar. Minor hits in the left field by the rim on the rev. Not what you wanna hear I know.

But when you get that coin, I'd really like to see a closeup of the portico on the rev. Something going on there but I'm not sure what.
That sums up my concerns about this coin in a nutshell. Problem is that I don't know when a better high grade toned example will surface, so my hands are kinda tied.
Lehigh96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 11:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
You get what you pay for.
 
bqcoins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nebraska/Iowa
Posts: 4,764
My Mood:
I couldn't do it for that price, just too much.
__________________
BQ
Sometime Numismatic Consultant
See my Bust Halves here: http://s240.photobucket.com/albums/f...albumview=grid
See my Holey coins here:http://s240.photobucket.com/albums/f...albumview=grid
bqcoins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2009, 11:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Amateur Photographer
 
the_man12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,955
My Mood:
It's a great coin and I love the toning, but I do think you overpaid.
__________________
20th Century Uncirculated Whitman Type Set Folder: 32/37 (86.5%)
the_man12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jefferson Nickel Errors cent_trail Error Coins 3 11-29-2008 08:40 PM
The Shadow Of Jefferson Nickel Error anthonystrd Error Coins 3 12-17-2007 04:02 PM
How much is a 1997 P Jefferson Nickel PCGS MS-68FS SMS Matte Finish worth? smullen What's it Worth 5 03-30-2007 01:26 AM
Jefferson Nickel sale: You make the call amcnichols US Coins Forum 12 06-11-2006 11:49 PM
farmer brown jefferson nickel billzach US Coins Forum 9 04-03-2005 12:01 AM

» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[25]
[18]
[13]
[13]
[13]
[12]
[12]
[11]
[10]
[10]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.