 | |
01-20-2009, 07:46 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Toning Freak
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood: | A tough call on a 1964-D Jefferson Nickel on E-Bay
I won this Jefferson Nickel on E-Bay on Sunday night from a very reputable toned coin seller for $300. The population is 7/0 and the Numismedia Wholesale price is $650. The only problem is that PCGS uses different standards for grading Jefferson Nickels than NGC and is consistently one grade lower than NGC. The PCGS price guide in MS66 is $275. My dilemna is that you just can't readily find 1964-D toned Jeffersons in MS66 or MS67. I felt like if I passed on this coin, I might not have another chance to find a superbly toned example any time in the near future. I don't have the coin yet but here are the seller's pics of the obverse. What does everyone think?
Now this one will probably be for sale for a long time to come, but I don't like the black on the peripheries for that price. http://cgi.ebay.com/MONSTER-TONED-1964-D-JEFFERSON-NICKEL-NGC-MS-67_W0QQitemZ120350937775QQihZ002QQcategoryZ41088QQ ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem |
| |
01-20-2009, 08:00 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: South, Florida
Posts: 121
|
The obverse is superbly toned. What does the reverse look like?
|
| |
01-20-2009, 08:09 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Toning Freak
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood: | |
| |
01-20-2009, 09:02 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | U.S. Money Collector
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,017
My Mood: |
I think it's a great coin!
Im not sure what your dilemma is though, is it that you wont be able to switch it over to PCGS in the same grade?
|
| |
01-20-2009, 09:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Supporter**
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,356
|
As a fellow collector of toned Jeffersons, I think you did just fine.
1964 is a tough year to find nice toners. I don't know what it is. There must have been a minor alloy change; some trace element present or missing from what was there before.
With as many 1964 nickels as were minted, I've never seen one in person that was MS-67, let alone one as nicely toned as this.
Let's put it this way: I highly doubt you'll lose money on it.
|
| |
01-20-2009, 09:28 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 50 Years and Still At It
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,589
My Mood: |
High grade Jeffs in 1964 are tough to find.
Looking at the mintage you would think there should be tons of them.
Nope.
The Mint went for quantity and kissed off quality.
All tied in with silver's demise.
__________________ ANA Member APS Member ARA Member There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't. |
| |
01-20-2009, 09:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Tennessee
Posts: 662
|
Purty. I likes it.
__________________
Monetary values amount to nothing in the face of a coin that's survived centuries to make it into my hand.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 12:40 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,706
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by borgovan As a fellow collector of toned Jeffersons, I think you did just fine.
1964 is a tough year to find nice toners. I don't know what it is. There must have been a minor alloy change; some trace element present or missing from what was there before.
With as many 1964 nickels as were minted, I've never seen one in person that was MS-67, let alone one as nicely toned as this.
Let's put it this way: I highly doubt you'll lose money on it. | that's odd I thought it was a bit pricey.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 03:06 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Toning Freak
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Magman I think it's a great coin!
Im not sure what your dilemma is though, is it that you wont be able to switch it over to PCGS in the same grade? | I am just not thrilled about buying a top pop coin with a population of 7 sight unseen. The photo of the reverse is too small to make my own determination about the grade of the coin. If the coin is overgraded, I paid PCGS price guide for a coin in an NGC holder worth 1/10th the price.
The dilemna is the gamble. I know I won't find a superbly toned high grade 1964-D on the market anytime soon, but I don't know that I just bought an MS67 or an MS66 in an MS67 holder.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 03:12 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | U.S. Money Collector
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,017
My Mood: |
ah gotcha.
I dunno, at least it's only a 300$ gamble, it could be worse.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 02:49 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: PA
Posts: 23,513
|
Personally, I think the coin got the bump for the color. Too many hits to make 67, but they are well hidden by the toning. Hits on the forehead, nose, in the hair, right fields and legends. Few minor ones on the collar. Minor hits in the left field by the rim on the rev. Not what you wanna hear I know.
But when you get that coin, I'd really like to see a closeup of the portico on the rev. Something going on there but I'm not sure what.
__________________
knowledge ..... share it
|
| |
01-21-2009, 08:55 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Numismatist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,706
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Magman ah gotcha.
I dunno, at least it's only a 300$ gamble, it could be worse. | Buy it now US $1,050.00
|
| |
01-21-2009, 09:36 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Toning Freak
Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: The Poker Room
Posts: 3,012
My Mood: | Quote:
Originally Posted by GDJMSP Personally, I think the coin got the bump for the color. Too many hits to make 67, but they are well hidden by the toning. Hits on the forehead, nose, in the hair, right fields and legends. Few minor ones on the collar. Minor hits in the left field by the rim on the rev. Not what you wanna hear I know.
But when you get that coin, I'd really like to see a closeup of the portico on the rev. Something going on there but I'm not sure what. | That sums up my concerns about this coin in a nutshell. Problem is that I don't know when a better high grade toned example will surface, so my hands are kinda tied.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 11:27 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | You get what you pay for.
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Nebraska/Iowa
Posts: 4,764
My Mood: |
I couldn't do it for that price, just too much.
|
| |
01-21-2009, 11:29 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Amateur Photographer
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,955
My Mood: |
It's a great coin and I love the toning, but I do think you overpaid.
__________________ 20th Century Uncirculated Whitman Type Set Folder: 32/37 (86.5%) |
| |  | | Would you like to support CoinTalk?
Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person. | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Newsletter | » Sponsors | | » Recent Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Today's Top Posters | | Top Posters in Last 1 Days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |