CoinTalk

Welcome to Coin Talk! Register Now, it's easy and FREE!

Thousands of coin collectors, numismatists, coin dealers, bullion investors, and enthusiasts make Coin Talk their number one source for numismatic news, information about US and world coins, discussions and community.

You are currently viewing Coin Talk as a guest, which limits your access to content, contests and information. By joining our free community, you will be able to join in discussions, contact other members, place free advertisements, enter contests, and much more. Registration is easy and free. Register Now


Go Back   CoinTalk > Coin Forums > Coin Chat

Notices

Coin Chat Please use this section for discussion of numismatic topics that don't fit in other sections.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2007, 05:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Danr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,942
My Mood:
Info on gold first spouse coins..

..Anyone know relaese date, price, or anything?

Danr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2007, 05:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Paul
 
n_sandler4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 802
The US Mint Website gives a date of June for the first proof gold spouse coin....
n_sandler4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 06:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
dreamer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
Denomination of First Spouse coins

Does anyone know why the First Spouse 1/2 oz. gold coins will have a $10 face value? The 1/2 oz. American Gold Eagles have a face value of $25. The $10 face Gold Eagle is only 1/4 oz.
dreamer94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 06:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wellington,New Zealand.
Posts: 6,467
That's because the First Ladies bullion issue are medal-coins,like the silver & gold Eagles are.

Aidan.
Aidan Work is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 06:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Expert Plunger Sniper
 
RickieB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7,393
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer94
Does anyone know why the First Spouse 1/2 oz. gold coins will have a $10 face value? The 1/2 oz. American Gold Eagles have a face value of $25. The $10 face Gold Eagle is only 1/4 oz.

The 1/2 oz Gold Commems are always $10 coins...in is written in the legislative articles that once signed make it into a law.

Hope that helps!

RickieB
__________________
"A disordered currency is one of the greatest political evils" Daniel Webster....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.M.C. 1972-1975
RickieB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 07:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
Troodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan Work
That's because the First Ladies bullion issue are medal-coins,like the silver & gold Eagles are.

Aidan.
There you go with "medal-coins" again... but anyway you're using somewhat flawed logic... if these are the same type of coin as the gold eagles it would not explain why their denominations are different than the gold eagles.

These are technically commemoratives, and as such are under the standing regulation that 1/2 oz gold commemoratives are required to carry a denomination of $10.

Bullion issues, such the as the gold, silver, and platinum eagles, and now the gold buffaloes, are covered by a different regulation than commemoratives, hence the differences in denominations.
__________________
"It's a Sacagawea dollar! You can take it to the bank, and trade it in for a real dollar!" -Marge Simpson

My paper money collection- updated constantly!
Troodon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 08:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mysticism and Tyrants
 
Moen1305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Land of Lincoln
Posts: 1,602
My Mood:
I don't really see what difference face value makes anyway. Who cares. They could put 1 cent face value and people are still going to look at the gold content first. Gold is never going to drop into the 10-25 dollar range again anyway. I just think the face value in the ranges we've seen so far are irrelevant at best.
__________________
Money is a lousy way to keep score!
Moen1305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 08:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
dreamer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moen1305
I don't really see what difference face value makes anyway. Who cares. They could put 1 cent face value and people are still going to look at the gold content first. Gold is never going to drop into the 10-25 dollar range again anyway. I just think the face value in the ranges we've seen so far are irrelevant at best.
I agree that it doesn't make much difference to the value of the coin, but someone must think it's important because the face values are different from their historical counterparts (e.g. $50 for a one-ounce coin vs. $20 historically) and the fact that platinum bullion coins have a face value twice that of their gold counterparts.
dreamer94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Numismatist
 
Danr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,942
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND86
Current Mint plan is to go on sale, without any immediate inventory, on May 9 with the 4 coin proof and 4 coin uncirculated sets as well as the individual Martha Washington proof and Martha Washington uncirculated coins. The rest of the individual first spouse coins will be introduced around the same time as the corresponding Presidential circulating coins.
thanks again, you are appreciated around here.
Danr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
dreamer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND86
Current Mint plan is to go on sale, without any immediate inventory, on May 9 with the 4 coin proof and 4 coin uncirculated sets as well as the individual Martha Washington proof and Martha Washington uncirculated coins. The rest of the individual first spouse coins will be introduced around the same time as the corresponding Presidential circulating coins.
Any word about subscriptions to the First Spouse proof sets?
dreamer94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
JBK
Coin Collector
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moen1305
I don't really see what difference face value makes anyway. Who cares. They could put 1 cent face value and people are still going to look at the gold content first. Gold is never going to drop into the 10-25 dollar range again anyway. I just think the face value in the ranges we've seen so far are irrelevant at best.
I don't pretend to recall all the logic behind it, but adding a face value (legal tender status) was key to the successful bullion series (SE/GE). The mont did make gold one ounce medals, and they were a flop. It was toughgoing to get a denomination put on the bullion coins, but it was apparently important for some reason.
JBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 12:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
Troodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBK
I don't pretend to recall all the logic behind it, but adding a face value (legal tender status) was key to the successful bullion series (SE/GE). The mont did make gold one ounce medals, and they were a flop. It was toughgoing to get a denomination put on the bullion coins, but it was apparently important for some reason.
Well on the plus side, even if they find a mountain in Antarctica made of solid gold and the price of gold plummets, your American gold eagle is still worth at least the face value.

Don't think that's the real reason though... gold has always been valuable, and always will be, unless a massive supply suddenly turns up. I think it's the psychological aspect mostly... making it a legal tender coin confers as sense of safety and legitimacy to it that make people more willing to buy one than they would say, a gold bar containing the same amount of gold. Plus it adds numismatic value to it, so people other than just gold investers find it a desirable purchase. Using the St. Gaudens double eagle obverse was an especially smart move; both collectors and non-collectors alike were attracted to the design.
__________________
"It's a Sacagawea dollar! You can take it to the bank, and trade it in for a real dollar!" -Marge Simpson

My paper money collection- updated constantly!
Troodon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 05:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
So which spouse coin would be better to get, the four piece set or individuals? Wil the subscriptions be better for one or the other?
sonjudawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 05:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
Troodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonjudawg
So which spouse coin would be better to get, the four piece set or individuals? Wil the subscriptions be better for one or the other?
Depends entirely on your personal preferences and budget. The 4 piece set I imagine will be no better or worse to get than 1 each of the 4 individual ones. If you want and can afford all 4, may as well get the set for convenience's sake. If you can only afford, or only want, some of the individual ones, may as well go that route.

I kind of like the design for Jefferson's Liberty, and may go for that, if budget permits. Getting all 4 I know will be beyond my budget.
__________________
"It's a Sacagawea dollar! You can take it to the bank, and trade it in for a real dollar!" -Marge Simpson

My paper money collection- updated constantly!
Troodon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2007, 04:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Coin Collector
 
dreamer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by ND86
Subscriptions should be out soon. Actually, there should be an impressive subscription offer on first spouses - wait and see.

Proof spouses will be VERY beautiful.
I got that impression from looking at artists renderings of them. I especially like the ones for presidents who didn't have wives which are going to be replicas of obsolete US coins, e.g. a capped bust obverse.

I read somewhere that the mintages of the presidential spouse coins will be on the order of 10,000. Is that accurate?
dreamer94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Would you like to support CoinTalk?

Coin Talk Code of Honor
1. Post unto others as you would have them post unto you.
2. Keep it clean, like a 1950s family television show.
3. If you don't like the coin, don't trash the person.

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Newsletter
Sign up for CoinTalk's Newsletter
enter your email address below.
» Unanswered Posts
Do You Have the Answer?
» Sponsors

» Today's Top Posters
Top Posters in Last 1 Days
[27]
[22]
[19]
[17]
[17]
[16]
[15]
[13]
[11]
[11]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 PM.


vBAdvertise v1.0.0 Copyright ©2009, PixelFX Studios
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Copyright 2008 CoinTalk
"Wiki" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.0.
Copyright © 2008 - 2010, Cracked Egg Studios.