Thread: 1964 HD Kennedy Half Dollars

I was searching my 1964 Kennedy halves to ensure that I didn't overlook them for the Heavily Accented Hair variety. My qestions are:
1) Does the coin have to be a proof w/deep cameo?
2) Do all of the characteristics have to be on the coin in order for it to be HD?

The characteristics I'm talking about are:
The missing serif on the lower left of ' I ' in United.
The ' V ' shape of the hair.
No vertical serif on the 'G' in the initials on the reverse.
The weak upper left tip of the shield on the reverse.

zeke

The accented hair variety for the 64 Kennedy halves are on proofs only, and all of the characteristics must be present as well.

http://www.bestcoin.com/1964-Proof-A...alf-Dollar.htm

Originally Posted by BUncirculated

The accented hair variety for the 64 Kennedy halves are on proofs only, and all of the characteristics must be present as well.

http://www.bestcoin.com/1964-Proof-A...alf-Dollar.htm

This is correct. The coin does not have to be a deep cameo...but it must be a proof.

Zekeguzz,

I post this everytime an accent hair thread comes up, but here it is again in case you find it helpful. (I think some of my pics are better than the thread linked above)



Mouse over or click to enlarge.

Originally Posted by zekeguzz

I was searching my 1964 Kennedy halves to ensure that I didn't overlook them for the Heavily Accented Hair variety. My qestions are:
1) Does the coin have to be a proof w/deep cameo?
2) Do all of the characteristics have to be on the coin in order for it to be HD?

The characteristics I'm talking about are:
The missing serif on the lower left of ' I ' in United.
The ' V ' shape of the hair.
No vertical serif on the 'G' in the initials on the reverse.
The weak upper left tip of the shield on the reverse.

zeke

I think the missing serif on the Lower left "I" is in the word LIBERTY not UNITED.

Originally Posted by Caleb

I think the missing serif on the Lower left "I" is in the word LIBERTY not UNITED.

Correct.

Geekpryde,

I sent you a PM, didn't know if you got it.

Originally Posted by geekpryde

Zekeguzz,

I post this everytime an accent hair thread comes up, but here it is again in case you find it helpful. (I think some of my pics are better than the thread linked above)



Mouse over or click to enlarge.

Thats because the photo's and text were lifted from the link below:

http://www.ipotad.com/pages/ah2.html

Originally Posted by 19Lyds

Thats because the photo's and text were lifted from the link below:

http://www.ipotad.com/pages/ah2.html

I did some looking at the images and don't think they are the same con.

Originally Posted by geekpryde

Correct.

I stand corrected. Thanks, that was a bad and dumb mistake.

Along with my bad photos and using the site information from 19Lyds and Cazkaboom I beleive that my 64 Kennedy is the 'transitional one'. The reverse 'HD' matches my coin but the obverse characteristic aren't there(tough to see).
Thanks for all your help. I'm going to label my coin " 1964 HDT ".
zeke

Originally Posted by zekeguzz

Along with my bad photos and using the site information from 19Lyds and Cazkaboom I beleive that my 64 Kennedy is the 'transitional one'. The reverse 'HD' matches my coin but the obverse characteristic aren't there(tough to see).
Thanks for all your help. I'm going to label my coin " 1964 HDT ".
zeke

Cool, I didnt even realize there were coins that showed some, but not all, accent hair characteristics. Sure enough your reverse has the broken rays and missing tail on the G. But your Obverse has neither of the other two traits. Thanks for posting the pics!

Originally Posted by 19Lyds

Thats because the photo's and text were lifted from the link below:

http://www.ipotad.com/pages/ah2.html

yes, I think ipotad and bestcoin links have the same photos and mostly the same exact text. Not sure which one ripped off the other. I see them both linked frequently.

But I hope you are not saying the pics I posted are ripped off, as I took those shots myself. (I dont think you are, but wasnt 100% sure on your meaning). Clearly my photos dont match either ipotad or bestcoin. I also have all the trial and error pics to prove it! (and the original RAW files).

Originally Posted by Cazkaboom

I did some looking at the images and don't think they are the same con.

yeah, what he said!

This one (mine) has "strong hair, " but does NOT meet the designation for "Accented Hair." That coin has very distinctive hairlines, and is very full, and deeply struck. Mine is just a very gemmy proof:





From "coin world" -- a comparison of accented hair and regular hair:

Originally Posted by zekeguzz

Along with my bad photos and using the site information from 19Lyds and Cazkaboom I beleive that my 64 Kennedy is the 'transitional one'. The reverse 'HD' matches my coin but the obverse characteristic aren't there(tough to see).
Thanks for all your help. I'm going to label my coin " 1964 HDT ".
zeke

I'm not looking at your coin in hand like you are, but are you sure it is a Proof? CONECA list the UVC-4 as the ODV-002 / RDV-001 for a business strike.