You vs PCGS: Guess the Grade of 1887 Morgan

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015.

Page 1 of 2
  1. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Guess the grade of this PCGS graded 1887 Morgan

    20150103_111615.jpg 20150103_111659.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015
    #1 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    MS-63.
     
    green18, Jan 3, 2015
    #2 + Quote Reply
  4. Cringely

    Cringely Active Member

    MS-63 primarily for bagmarks. I'm guessing PCGS graded it higher
     
    Cringely, Jan 3, 2015
    #3 + Quote Reply
  5. KoinJester

    KoinJester Well-Known Member

    63
     
    KoinJester, Jan 3, 2015
    #4 + Quote Reply
  6. mikem2000

    mikem2000 Lost Cause

    MS 64
     
    mikem2000, Jan 3, 2015
    #5 + Quote Reply
  7. zachfromnj

    zachfromnj Junior Member

    MS Details
     
    zachfromnj, Jan 3, 2015
    #6 + Quote Reply
  8. rhwsu

    rhwsu Member

    MS-63. I also think because of bag marks on the prime focal areas on obverse (face) and reverse (wing)
     
    rhwsu, Jan 3, 2015
    #7 + Quote Reply
  9. WLH22

    WLH22 Well-Known Member

    MS64 for me.
     
    WLH22, Jan 3, 2015
    #8 + Quote Reply
  10. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I think it's a 64 and I bet PCGS gave it a 64+
     
    C-B-D, Jan 3, 2015
    #9 + Quote Reply
  11. wcoins

    wcoins GEM-ber

    62 overdipped
     
    wcoins, Jan 3, 2015
    #10 + Quote Reply
  12. Weston

    Weston Well-Known Member

    63
     
    Weston, Jan 3, 2015
    #11 + Quote Reply
  13. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    63+
     
    rlm's cents, Jan 3, 2015
    #12 + Quote Reply
  14. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Here's another pic.
     
    coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015
    #13 + Quote Reply
  15. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Screenshot_2015-01-03-12-35-50.png
     
    coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015
    #14 + Quote Reply
  16. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    20150103_132553.jpg

    Anyone want to know the grade?
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2015
    coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015
    #15 + Quote Reply
  17. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Here is the grade... 20150103_134455(0).jpg
     
    coinman1234, Jan 3, 2015
    #16 + Quote Reply
    C-B-D likes this.
  18. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    I'd have said 63 all day, but I'm not surprised they said 64.
     
    Paul M., Jan 3, 2015
    #17 + Quote Reply
  19. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Too 'baggy' for a '64 but that's just me........
     
    green18, Jan 3, 2015
    #18 + Quote Reply
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I was gonna say 64. The reverse looks pretty nice, but the obverse is so beat up that it brings the grade down. If I were to split grade this, I'd call it 63/65 (which nets out to a low end 64).
     
    physics-fan3.14, Jan 3, 2015
    #19 + Quote Reply
  21. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I was gonna say they called a 64 in my opinion is a 63
     
    Mainebill, Jan 3, 2015
    #20 + Quote Reply
10 more messages...
Page 1 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page