Guess the Assigned Grade--1887 Morgan Dollar PCGS

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Lehigh96, Nov 26, 2014.

?

Guess the Assigned Grade

  1. MS63

    4.4%
  2. MS63+

    4.4%
  3. MS64

    33.3%
  4. MS64+

    11.1%
  5. MS65

    28.9%
  6. MS65+

    11.1%
  7. MS66

    6.7%
  8. MS66+

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Other (Please Explain in Comments)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Guess the assigned grade of the 1887 PCGS graded Morgan Dollar shown below. Please vote in the attached poll and tell me the reasons for your grade in your responses.

    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome!
     
    swamp yankee likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. zpalmer

    zpalmer Member

  4. zpalmer

    zpalmer Member

    ms64, sorry
     
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    You can only vote in the poll once, hope you chose the right one!
     
  6. zpalmer

    zpalmer Member

    ms64 was my vote, I accidentally hit the 5
     
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    You didn't vote yet, the poll is up top!
     
  8. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    I voted 64+ for eye appeal, but the hits keep the coin away from 65.
     
  9. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    Gave it a 64. I am not sure, but I don't like what looks like a scratch across the date.
     
  10. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    That scratch is on the slab, not the coin.
     
  11. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    good. then i am more confident of it being a 64.
     
  12. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    It's an awfully nice strike on, both, obverse and reverse. So, I gave it a 65 despite the small hits on the cheek & eyebrow.

    Chris
     
  13. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I like the coin. Luster looks nice and it's not blast white. The tiny bit of toning looks great to me. I went with 65.
     
  14. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    I also chose 65, some chatter and hits, but good strike and very nice eye appeal. Nice muted album toning, too.
    Sorry, Larry, I know this looks a lot like what you wrote. I agree.
     
  15. brg5658

    brg5658 Supporter! Supporter

    I couldn't decide between 64 and 65 straight grades. So I went with 64+. I think the hit on the eyebrow is particularly distracting, the little grazes on the cheek less so, but the remainder of the coin is stellar. The reverse is particularly lovely, but I know Morgan grades hinge primarily on the obverse.

    I would be okay with this coin in an MS65 holder, but I can't see much higher than that.
     
    princeofwaldo likes this.
  16. krispy

    krispy krispy

  17. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    I'm guessing an MS64 in an MS65 slab.
    I think the marks on the cheek & neck hold it back from higher grades.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2014
    princeofwaldo and medjoy like this.
  18. WLH22

    WLH22 Well-Known Member

    I think MS64. Very common date and there are hits to the face that would keep it from getting a 65.
     
  19. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    I chose MS65. Contact marks on the devices not too severe, but evident. I think the luster would be outstanding, so I gave it a bump.
     
  20. C G Memminger

    C G Memminger Active Member

    small dings in lower cheek, small amount noise in open field, a little noise in open field on reverse.....64+ pretty coin.
     
  21. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    MS 65. First of all, the plus grades are not given all that often compared with a straight 64 or 65--they are for coins that are really high in grade, but not quite the next grade up. So, looking at the coin, it is clearly more than a 64-- almost completely clean cheek, nice fields, without the usual bag marks on the obverse. Reverse is cleaner than the obverse--Looks like a 66 reverse, but there are some contact marks on the obverse, so I would take the average overall grade of 65. Luster hard to determine just solely from a photograph, but the coin looks nice and lustrous to me. A bit of nice peripheral toning has formed, probably after a light dip. So, I will go with 65--had the obverse had NO cheek marks at all, I would have gone solid 66.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page