GTG: 1889 $1 Gold

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Jun 21, 2021.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Last year of issue. Graded by PCGS.

    B0F4416C-ED66-4CFD-9575-5B6F90DF2DCE.jpeg 4D291353-A4CA-4464-B7F8-2186079FAB43.jpeg
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    It's gotta be at least MS65. There are a few blemishes, but nothing terribly distracting. The luster is superb.
    David Betts and Santinidollar like this.
  4. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Unwell Unknown Unmembered Supporter

    That and the $3 from 1889 are on my want list for the future.
    Santinidollar and David Betts like this.
  5. J.T. Parker

    J.T. Parker Well-Known Member

    65 & possibly a ++
    Santinidollar likes this.
  6. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    Very pretty.

    I do however see what looks like a couple luster breaks. Specifically a couple in the fields so I'm gonna be "that guy" and say AU58.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  7. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    MS62. If I'm close I just got lucky.

    I do think the relatively low mintages of these add to their appeal. On my bucket list.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  8. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x -1883 O nut

  9. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I’m at MS-63.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  11. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member

  12. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    I’ll give this one until this evening.
  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    MS 61. A definite slider.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  14. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    Nice pickup! Thinking MS-65
    Santinidollar likes this.
  15. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 62 or 63 is what I'm debating...I'll give it the benefit of doubt and say 63 (looks like nice enough luster to push it up to that level)
    Santinidollar likes this.
  16. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I'm going to say 64,love old gold.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  17. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    looks like great luster, and decent strike . I think the obv. contact marks limit it to 64.
    Santinidollar likes this.
  18. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

  19. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted Supporter

    I think you’re spot on. Luster/strike is great but the surface preservation not good enough for a gem BU grade.
    Santinidollar and ddddd like this.
  20. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  21. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page