GTG: 1884o Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jun 23, 2021.


Grade, and comments.

  1. MS 60

    0 vote(s)
  2. MS 61

    0 vote(s)
  3. MS 62

    1 vote(s)
  4. MS 63

    2 vote(s)
  5. MS 64

    8 vote(s)
  6. MS 65

    5 vote(s)
  7. MS 66

    1 vote(s)
  8. PL

    13 vote(s)
  9. DMPL

    2 vote(s)
  10. +

    0 vote(s)
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Another, for your consideration.

    D20DD21B-DC68-4F59-ACC7-C305A02080DB.jpeg D81846F6-0F3F-426A-A3A1-C26A15F49986.jpeg
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Well-Known Member


    Solid hammer strike. Incredible luster with contrast. Unfortunate ding under her chin.
    Anthony Mazza and Morgandude11 like this.
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

    64 Proof . Nice Coin !
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  5. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    MS-64 PL
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  6. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    Very nicely struck, clean coin. I think it's a solid MS64PL. I do not think the mirrors are there to earn a DMPL.
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    65 PL. That reverse looks exceptionally crisp and clean. Nice gold tone as well.
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  8. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  9. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

  10. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky Supporter

  11. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member

  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Any more takers?
  13. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

  14. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    64 PL ....frosty with nice mirrors...cheek mostly has luster grazes/breaks in the frost but I believe I see a few hits too...reverse has something under "States" that looks like a hit...and I also see what looks like a few fingerprints/haziness (which is what prevented me from going DMPL or 65)...nice overall example for a New Orleans Morgan
  15. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I somehow missed the ding on my initial inspection (still sticking with my 64 PL grade). I do wonder if it really is a ding or a reflection of something (or even a piece of the slab that chipped off and became stuck inside the holder).
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    It is not a ding, as it isn’t indented. It is a surface mark, but is not a gouge or any kind of scratch or bagmark. My opinion is it is a die marker artifact. Photographs, and the reflections exaggerate its actual size and significance.
    ddddd likes this.
  17. thejaxcollector

    thejaxcollector Active Member

  18. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  19. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    64 DMPL i think
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Okay, no big surprises. It did get the benefit of the doubt on that obverse artifact. As I said, it was not a nick or gauge, so probably just a die polish artifact. As most people figured, it is a PL coin. In hand, it is very attractive. As per usual with PL coins, they look better in hand, no matter how good or atrocious the photographs may be.

    ddddd, COOPER12 and potty dollar 1878 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page